> -----Original Message----- > From: Srivatsa, Anusha > Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 9:59 AM > To: 'Tvrtko Ursulin' <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; intel- > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ingo Molnar > <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>; Dave Hansen > <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Joonas Lahtinen > <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [v3 0/3] Introduce Raptor Lake S > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 2:57 PM > > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ingo Molnar > > <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>; Dave Hansen > > <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Joonas Lahtinen > > <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Nikula, Jani > > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [v3 0/3] Introduce Raptor Lake S > > > > > > On 03/12/2021 06:35, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > > > Raptor Lake S(RPL-S) is a version 12 Display, Media and Render. For > > > all i915 purposes it is the same as Alder Lake S (ADL-S). > > > > > > The series introduces it as a subplatform of ADL-S. The one > > > difference is the GuC submission which is default on RPL-S but was > > > not the case with ADL-S. > > > > As a side note, not a blocker of any kind, I am slightly disheartened > > but the confusion of ADL_P and ADL_S being separate platforms, but > > then RPL_S is subplatform of ADL_S. Maybe it is just me not being able > > to keep track of things. > > > > > All patches are reviewed. Jani has acked the series. > > > Looking for other acks in order to merge these to respective branches. > > > > Which branches would that be for this series? First two to > > drm-intel-next and last one to drm-intel-gt-next? Is that complication > > needed and/or worth the effort? > > Tvrtko, > All three have to land to drm-intel-next. The last one has dependency on the > first patch and is a trivial change. @Ursulin, Tvrtko @Joonas Lahtinen can I get an ack to merge these into drm-intel-next branch? Anusha > Anusha > > Regards, > > > > Tvrtko > > > > > Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Anusha Srivatsa (3): > > > drm/i915/rpl-s: Add PCI IDS for Raptor Lake S > > > drm/i915/rpl-s: Add PCH Support for Raptor Lake S > > > drm/i915/rpl-s: Enable guc submission by default > > > > > > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 7 +++++++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 3 +++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c | 1 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h | 1 + > > > include/drm/i915_pciids.h | 9 +++++++++ > > > 9 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >
