On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 9:34 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:44:14PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:40 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:55:41PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 7:45 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:02:47AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > + dsi->panel = of_drm_find_panel(remote);
> > > > > > > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(dsi->panel)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > + dsi->panel = NULL;
> > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > + dsi->next_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
> > > > > > > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > + dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to find bridge\n");
> > > > > > > > > > > + return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge);
> > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > > > > > > + dsi->next_bridge = NULL;
> > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > + of_node_put(remote);
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Using devm_drm_of_get_bridge would greatly simplify the driver
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm aware of this and this would break the existing sunxi dsi binding,
> > > > > > > > > we are not using ports based pipeline in dsi node. Of-course you have
> > > > > > > > > pointed the same before, please check below
> > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20210322140152.101709-2-jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Then drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge needs to be adjusted to handle the DSI
> > > > > > > > bindings and look for a panel or bridge not only through the OF graph,
> > > > > > > > but also on the child nodes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Okay. I need to check this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > devm_drm_of_get_bridge is not working with legacy binding like the one
> > > > > > used in sun6i dsi
> > > > >
> > > > > There's nothing legacy about it.
> > > >
> > > > What I'm mean legacy here with current binding used in sun6i-dsi like this.
> > > >
> > > > &dsi {
> > > > vcc-dsi-supply = <®_dcdc1>; /* VCC-DSI */
> > > > status = "okay";
> > > >
> > > > panel@0 {
> > > > compatible = "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16-icn6211";
> > > > reg = <0>;
> > > > reset-gpios = <&r_pio 0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /*
> > > > LCD-RST: PL5 */
> > > > enable-gpios = <&pio 1 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /*
> > > > LCD-PWR-EN: PB7 */
> > > > backlight = <&backlight>;
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > >
> > > Yes, I know, it's the generic DSI binding. It's still not legacy.
> > >
> > > > devm_drm_of_get_bridge cannot find the device with above binding and
> > > > able to find the device with below binding.
> > > >
> > > > &dsi {
> > > > vcc-dsi-supply = <®_dcdc1>; /* VCC-DSI */
> > > > status = "okay";
> > > >
> > > > ports {
> > > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > #size-cells = <0>;
> > > >
> > > > dsi_out: port@0 {
> > > > reg = <0>;
> > > >
> > > > dsi_out_bridge: endpoint {
> > > > remote-endpoint = <&bridge_out_dsi>;
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > panel@0 {
> > > > compatible = "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16-icn6211";
> > > > reg = <0>;
> > > > reset-gpios = <&r_pio 0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* LCD-RST: PL5 */
> > > > enable-gpios = <&pio 1 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* LCD-PWR-EN: PB7 */
> > > > backlight = <&backlight>;
> > > >
> > > > port {
> > > > bridge_out_dsi: endpoint {
> > > > remote-endpoint = <&dsi_out_bridge>;
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > >
> > > Yes, I know, and that's because ...
> >
> > Okay. I will use find panel and bridge separately instead of
> > devm_drm_of_get_bridge in version patches.
>
> That's not been my point, at all?
>
> I mean, that whole discussion has been because you shouldn't do that.
>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20211122065223.88059-6-jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dsi->dev, dsi->dev->of_node, 0, 0);
> > > > > > if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge))
> > > > > > return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is only working if we have ports on the pipeline, something like this
> > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20210214194102.126146-8-jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please have a look and let me know if I miss anything?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, you're missing the answer you quoted earlier:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I'm trying to resolve the comment one after another. Will get back.
> > >
> > > ... You've ignored that comment.
> >
> > Not understand which comment you mean. There are few about bridge
> > conversion details, I will send my comments.
>
> The one that got quoted there and you removed. For reference:
>
> > Then drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge needs to be adjusted to handle the DSI
> > bindings and look for a panel or bridge not only through the OF graph,
> > but also on the child nodes
>
> devm_drm_of_get_bridge uses drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge under the hood,
> so of course it won't find it if drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge doesn't.
> You need to modify drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge to also look for child
> devices and see if there's a panel or bridge registered for that child
> node. Then devm_drm_of_get_bridge will work as you intend it to.
Got it now, I will make necessary changes.
Thanks,
Jagan.
