Quoting Biju Das (2021-11-26 10:51:48)
> Hi Kieran,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> > Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm: rcar-du: mipi-dsi: Support bridge probe ordering
> >
> > The bridge probe ordering for DSI devices has been clarified and further
> > documented in
> >
> > To support connecting with the SN65DSI86 device after commit c3b75d4734cb
> > ("drm/bridge: sn65dsi86: Register and attach our DSI device at probe"),
> > update to the new probe ordering to remove a perpetual -EPROBE_DEFER loop
> > between the two devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c | 48 +++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c
> > index 833f4480bdf3..f783bacee8da 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c
> > @@ -639,6 +639,8 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct
> > mipi_dsi_host *host,
> > struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
> > {
> > struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(host);
> > + struct drm_panel *panel;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > if (device->lanes > dsi->num_data_lanes)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -646,12 +648,36 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct
> > mipi_dsi_host *host,
> > dsi->lanes = device->lanes;
> > dsi->format = device->format;
> >
> > + ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dsi->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel,
> > + &dsi->next_bridge);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n");
> > + return ret;
>
> This can merged with previous line. return dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n");
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!dsi->next_bridge) {
> > + dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dsi->dev, panel);
> > + if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) {
> > + dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to create panel bridge\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge);
>
> Why not return dev_err_probe??
Yes, I think it probably should. This was just a code move, so I didn't
change it.
--
Kieran
>
> Cheers,
> Biju
>
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Initialize the DRM bridge. */
> > + dsi->bridge.funcs = &rcar_mipi_dsi_bridge_ops;
> > + dsi->bridge.of_node = dsi->dev->of_node;
> > + drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> > struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
> > {
> > + struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(host);
> > +
> > + drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -766,21 +792,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > return PTR_ERR(dsi->rstc);
> > }
> >
> > - ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dsi->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel,
> > - &dsi->next_bridge);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n");
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (!dsi->next_bridge) {
> > - dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dsi->dev, panel);
> > - if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) {
> > - dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to create panel bridge\n");
> > - return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > /* Initialize the DSI host. */
> > dsi->host.dev = dsi->dev;
> > dsi->host.ops = &rcar_mipi_dsi_host_ops; @@ -788,11 +799,6 @@ static
> > int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - /* Initialize the DRM bridge. */
> > - dsi->bridge.funcs = &rcar_mipi_dsi_bridge_ops;
> > - dsi->bridge.of_node = dsi->dev->of_node;
> > - drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge);
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -800,8 +806,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev) {
> > struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > - drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge);
> > -
> > mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host);
> >
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 2.30.2
>
