On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:22:08PM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote: > From: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > There was a desire to not have a virtgpu-specific implementation of > poll(..), but there wasn't any real event to return either. > > Solution: Dummy event with just event code > > Context: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2021-November/330950.html > > Userspace: > > crrev.com/c/3296610 > > This series applies to drm-misc-fixes. On the series: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> I'm assuming someone from Google can push this to drm-misc-fixes for you? -Daniel > > Gurchetan Singh (2): > drm/virtgpu api: define a dummy fence signaled event > drm/virtio: use drm_poll(..) instead of virtio_gpu_poll(..) > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 42 +------------------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 1 - > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 2 +- > include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 7 +++++ > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
