On Sun, 21 Nov 2021, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le 21/11/2021 à 11:13, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx a écrit :
>> From: yong yiran <yong.yiran@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The clang_analyzer complains as follows:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c:2119:2 warning:
>> Value stored to 'x' is never read
>>
>> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: yong yiran <yong.yiran@xxxxxxxxxx>
The sender's Signed-off-by is missing.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 3 ---
>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> index 820a1f38b271..5e4420f461e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> @@ -2047,7 +2047,6 @@ void i915_request_show(struct drm_printer *m,
>> {
>> const char *name = rq->fence.ops->get_timeline_name((struct dma_fence *)&rq->fence);
>> char buf[80] = "";
>> - int x = 0;
>>
>> /*
>> * The prefix is used to show the queue status, for which we use
>> @@ -2079,8 +2078,6 @@ void i915_request_show(struct drm_printer *m,
>> * from the lists
>> */
>>
>> - x = print_sched_attr(&rq->sched.attr, buf, x, sizeof(buf));
>> -
>
> Seriously?
Basically I've started considering all of these patches as static
analyzer reports *only*. The "fixes" have often been completely wrong or
have missed the real issue and merely silenced the warning.
I really couldn't say anything about the "Zeal Robot" itself, but the
patches are giving it a bad reputation.
BR,
Jani.
>
> CJ
>
>
>> drm_printf(m, "%s%.*s%c %llx:%lld%s%s %s @ %dms: %s\n",
>> prefix, indent, " ",
>> queue_status(rq),
>>
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
