Hi Joel,
Thanks for your comment.
I will modify the patch and send it again.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 2:19 PM
> To: Tommy Huang <tommy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>; Rob
> Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>;
> linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list:DRM DRIVERS
> <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; devicetree <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; BMC-SW <BMC-SW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/aspeed: Update INTR_STS handling
>
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 11:01, tommy-huang
> <tommy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The V-sync INTR_STS is differnet on AST2600.
> > Change into general rule to handle it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: tommy-huang <tommy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx.h | 2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx_drv.c | 26
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx.h
> > index 96501152bafa..5eed9275bce7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ struct aspeed_gfx {
> > struct regmap *scu;
> >
> > u32 dac_reg;
> > + u32 int_reg;
> > + u32 int_clr_reg;
> > u32 vga_scratch_reg;
> > u32 throd_val;
> > u32 scan_line_max;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx_drv.c
> > index b53fee6f1c17..1092060cb59c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/aspeed/aspeed_gfx_drv.c
> > @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@
> >
> > struct aspeed_gfx_config {
> > u32 dac_reg; /* DAC register in SCU */
> > + u32 int_status_reg; /* Interrupt status register */
>
> This is the same for all supported chips; do you need to introduce the variable
> for it?
>
> > + u32 int_clear_reg; /* Interrupt clear register */
> > u32 vga_scratch_reg; /* VGA scratch register in SCU */
> > u32 throd_val; /* Default Threshold Seting */
> > u32 scan_line_max; /* Max memory size of one scan line */
> > @@ -67,6 +69,8 @@ struct aspeed_gfx_config {
> >
> > static const struct aspeed_gfx_config ast2400_config = {
> > .dac_reg = 0x2c,
> > + .int_status_reg = 0x60,
> > + .int_clear_reg = 0x60,
> > .vga_scratch_reg = 0x50,
> > .throd_val = CRT_THROD_LOW(0x1e) | CRT_THROD_HIGH(0x12),
> > .scan_line_max = 64,
> > @@ -74,14 +78,26 @@ static const struct aspeed_gfx_config
> > ast2400_config = {
> >
> > static const struct aspeed_gfx_config ast2500_config = {
> > .dac_reg = 0x2c,
> > + .int_status_reg = 0x60,
> > + .int_clear_reg = 0x60,
> > .vga_scratch_reg = 0x50,
> > .throd_val = CRT_THROD_LOW(0x24) | CRT_THROD_HIGH(0x3c),
> > .scan_line_max = 128,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct aspeed_gfx_config ast2600_config = {
> > + .dac_reg = 0xc0,
> > + .int_status_reg = 0x60,
> > + .int_clear_reg = 0x68,
> > + .vga_scratch_reg = 0x50,
> > + .throd_val = CRT_THROD_LOW(0x50) | CRT_THROD_HIGH(0x70),
> > + .scan_line_max = 128,
> > +};
>
> This patch combines adding the clear_reg functionality with support for the
> 2600. Can you split them out; add int_clear_reg first, and then add support for
> the 2600 in the following patch?
>
>
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id aspeed_gfx_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-gfx", .data = &ast2400_config },
> > { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-gfx", .data = &ast2500_config
> > },
> > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-gfx", .data = &ast2600_config
> > + },
> > { },
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, aspeed_gfx_match); @@ -113,13 +129,15 @@
> > static irqreturn_t aspeed_gfx_irq_handler(int irq, void *data) {
> > struct drm_device *drm = data;
> > struct aspeed_gfx *priv = to_aspeed_gfx(drm);
> > - u32 reg;
> > + u32 reg, clr_reg;
> >
> > - reg = readl(priv->base + CRT_CTRL1);
> > + reg = readl(priv->base + priv->int_reg);
> >
> > if (reg & CRT_CTRL_VERTICAL_INTR_STS) {
> > drm_crtc_handle_vblank(&priv->pipe.crtc);
> > - writel(reg, priv->base + CRT_CTRL1);
> > + clr_reg = (readl(priv->base + priv->int_clr_reg) |
> > + CRT_CTRL_VERTICAL_INTR_STS);
> > + writel(clr_reg, priv->base + priv->int_clr_reg);
> You do not need to do read-modify-write.
>
> On the 2500 you're writing back the value you read. On the 2600 all of the bits
> are read only except the INTR_STS bit, which is W1C, so you can use the value
> you read from CRT_CTRL1, so this should be enough:
>
> writel(reg, priv->base + priv->int_clr_reg);
>
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -147,6 +165,8 @@ static int aspeed_gfx_load(struct drm_device *drm)
> > config = match->data;
> >
> > priv->dac_reg = config->dac_reg;
> > + priv->int_reg = config->int_status_reg;
> > + priv->int_clr_reg = config->int_clear_reg;
> > priv->vga_scratch_reg = config->vga_scratch_reg;
> > priv->throd_val = config->throd_val;
> > priv->scan_line_max = config->scan_line_max;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
