On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:58 AM Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
If vfpriv is null, we shouldn't check vfpriv->ring_idx_mask.
Signed-off-by: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
index 749db18dcfa2..7975ea06b316 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static __poll_t virtio_gpu_poll(struct file *filp,
struct drm_pending_event *e = NULL;
__poll_t mask = 0;
- if (!vfpriv->ring_idx_mask)
+ if (!vfpriv || !vfpriv->ring_idx_mask)
return drm_poll(filp, wait);
poll_wait(filp, &drm_file->event_wait, wait);
Nevermind, looks like fix was merged in the main tree and will make it back to to drm-misc-next:
--
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog
