Hi Am 05.11.21 um 13:00 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
On 11/5/21 11:04, Jani Nikula wrote:On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[snip]Do you envision other condition that could be added later to disable a DRM driver ? Or do you think that just from a code readability point of view makes worth it ?Taking a step back for perspective. I think there's broad consensus in moving the parameter to drm, naming the check function to drm_something_something(), and breaking the ties to CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE. I appreciate the work you're doing to that effect.Thanks, I appreciate your feedback and comments.I think everything beyond that is still a bit vague and/or contentious. So how about making the first 2-3 patches just that? Something we can all agree on, makes good progress, improves the kernel, and gives us something to build on?That works for me. Thomas, do you agree with that approach ?
Sure. I think that's more or less what I proposed in my reply to that mail. Best regards Thomas
Best regards,
-- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
