From: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@xxxxxxxxxx> coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show functions: WARNING use scnprintf or sprintf Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf, snprintf or sprintf makes more sense. Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c index 4b0793abdd84..a2c7c5cb1523 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static ssize_t dsicm_num_errors_show(struct device *dev, if (r) return r; - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", errors); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", errors); } static ssize_t dsicm_hw_revision_show(struct device *dev, @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static ssize_t dsicm_hw_revision_show(struct device *dev, if (r) return r; - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%02x.%02x.%02x\n", id1, id2, id3); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%02x.%02x.%02x\n", id1, id2, id3); } static ssize_t dsicm_store_ulps(struct device *dev, @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static ssize_t dsicm_show_ulps(struct device *dev, t = ddata->ulps_enabled; mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock); - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", t); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", t); } static ssize_t dsicm_store_ulps_timeout(struct device *dev, @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static ssize_t dsicm_show_ulps_timeout(struct device *dev, t = ddata->ulps_timeout; mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock); - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", t); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", t); } static DEVICE_ATTR(num_dsi_errors, S_IRUGO, dsicm_num_errors_show, NULL); -- 2.25.1
