On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:19:21AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote: > Remove legacy PWM interface (pwm_config, pwm_enable, pwm_disable) and > replace it for the atomic PWM API. > > Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@xxxxxx> > --- > V1 -> V2: Initialize variable and simply conditional loop > V2 -> V3: Fix assignment of NULL variable > V3 -> V4: Replace division for pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle > --- > drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c | 20 ++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c > index e94932c69f54..bbf24564082a 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c > @@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static int lp855x_configure(struct lp855x *lp) > > static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br) > { > - unsigned int period = lp->pdata->period_ns; > - unsigned int duty = br * period / max_br; > struct pwm_device *pwm; > + struct pwm_state state; > > /* request pwm device with the consumer name */ > if (!lp->pwm) { > @@ -245,18 +244,15 @@ static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br) > > lp->pwm = pwm; > > - /* > - * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to > - * the atomic PWM API. > - */ > - pwm_apply_args(pwm); > + pwm_init_state(lp->pwm, &state); > + state.period = lp->pdata->period_ns; > } > > - pwm_config(lp->pwm, duty, period); > - if (duty) > - pwm_enable(lp->pwm); > - else > - pwm_disable(lp->pwm); > + pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, &state); Should this be: } else { pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, &state); } As currently written this will clobber the state.period that was set above. Daniel. > + pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(&state, br, max_br); > + state.enabled = state.duty_cycle; > + > + pwm_apply_state(lp->pwm, &state); > } > > static int lp855x_bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl) > -- > 2.31.1 >