Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix recursive lock in GuC submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 03:23:00PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Hellström (2021-10-21 08:39:48)
> > On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 12:21 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> > > Fixes: 1a52faed31311 ("drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is
> > > pinned with GuC submission")
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> This Cc: stable annotation is unnecessary.
> 
> Please always use "dim fixes 1a52faed31311" for helping to decide which
> Cc's are needed. In this case stable is not needed. If it was, there
> would be an indication of kernel version. In this case this is fine to
> be picked up by in drm-intel-next-fixes PR.
> 
> Let's pay attention to the right Fixes: annotation while submitting and
> reviewing patches.
> 

Will do. Working on getting push rights. Is there any documentation with
all the rules when pushing as it seems like there are a lot of rules.

Matt 

> Regards, Joonas



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux