Op 21-10-2021 om 12:38 schreef Christian König: > Am 21.10.21 um 12:35 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> From: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >> >> Simplifying the code a bit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >> [mlankhorst: Handle timeout = 0 correctly, use new i915_request_wait_timeout.] >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > LGTM, do you want to push it or should I pick it up into drm-misc-next? I think it can be applied to drm-intel-gt-next, after a backmerge. It needs patch 1 too, which fixes i915_request_wait semantics when used in dma-fence. It exports a dma-fence compatible i915_request_wait_timeout function, used in this patch.
