Re: Should multiple PRIME_FD_TO_HANDLE ioctls on the same fd require multiple GEM_CLOSE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Should multiple PRIME_FD_TO_HANDLE ioctls on the same fd require multiple GEM_CLOSE?
From: Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:33:18 +0000
Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <mg3bmgt12b5s7qlqn1gkc5q8f75dgfu91m@4ax.com>
References: <mg3bmgt12b5s7qlqn1gkc5q8f75dgfu91m@4ax.com>
Reply-to: Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Yes, this is expected behavior, even if it's not intuitive. For more
details, see:

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/merge_requests/110

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should multiple PRIME_FD_TO_HANDLE ioctls on the same fd require multiple GEM_CLOSE?
  - From: John Cox

References:
- Should multiple PRIME_FD_TO_HANDLE ioctls on the same fd require multiple GEM_CLOSE?
  - From: John Cox

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dsi: Use division result from div_u64_rem in 7nm and 14nm PLL
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] drm/vmwgfx: Support module unload and hotunplug
Previous by thread: Should multiple PRIME_FD_TO_HANDLE ioctls on the same fd require multiple GEM_CLOSE?
Next by thread: Re: Should multiple PRIME_FD_TO_HANDLE ioctls on the same fd require multiple GEM_CLOSE?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux