2021年9月30日(木) 15:37 Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:20 PM Shunsuke Mie <mie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Implement a new provider method for dma-buf base memory registration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <mie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > providers/rxe/rxe.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/providers/rxe/rxe.c b/providers/rxe/rxe.c
> > index 3c3ea8bb..84e00e60 100644
> > --- a/providers/rxe/rxe.c
> > +++ b/providers/rxe/rxe.c
> > @@ -239,6 +239,26 @@ static struct ibv_mr *rxe_reg_mr(struct ibv_pd *pd, void *addr, size_t length,
> > return &vmr->ibv_mr;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct ibv_mr *rxe_reg_dmabuf_mr(struct ibv_pd *pd, uint64_t offset,
> > + size_t length, uint64_t iova, int fd,
> > + int access)
> > +{
> > + struct verbs_mr *vmr;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + vmr = malloc(sizeof(*vmr));
> > + if (!vmr)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
>
> Do we need to set vmr to zero like the following?
>
> memset(vmr, 0, sizeof(*vmr));
>
> Zhu Yanjun
Thank you for your quick response.
I think it is better to clear the vmr. Actually the mlx5 driver allocates
the vmr using calloc().
In addition, rxe_reg_mr() (not rxe_reg_dmabuf_mr()) is used the malloc
and not clear the vmr. I think It has to be fixed too. Should I make
another patch to fix this problem?
Thanks a lot.
Shunsuke
~
