On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 04:10:14PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Currently autoloading for SPI devices does not use the DT ID table, it uses
> SPI modalises. Supporting OF modalises is going to be difficult if not
> impractical, an attempt was made but has been reverted, so ensure that
> module autoloading works for this driver by adding a SPI device ID table.
>
> Fixes: 96c8395e2166 ("spi: Revert modalias changes")
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c b/drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c
> index 9b50bc96e00f..c64b1fbe027f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c
> @@ -565,6 +565,19 @@ static struct lcd_ops hx8357_ops = {
> .get_power = hx8357_get_power,
> };
>
> +static const struct spi_device_id hx8357_spi_ids[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "hx8357",
> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)hx8357_lcd_init,
Based on this I had expected to find spi_get_device_id() and a ->driver_data
somewhere in this patch.
Where will this .driver_data be consumed?
Daniel.
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "hx8369",
> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)hx8369_lcd_init,
> + },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, hx8357_spi_ids);
> +
> static const struct of_device_id hx8357_dt_ids[] = {
> {
> .compatible = "himax,hx8357",
> @@ -672,6 +685,7 @@ static struct spi_driver hx8357_driver = {
> .name = "hx8357",
> .of_match_table = hx8357_dt_ids,
> },
> + .id_table = hx8357_spi_ids,
> };
>
> module_spi_driver(hx8357_driver);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
