On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:17 PM Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Coverity complains of a resource leak in ga102_chan_new():
>
> CID 119637 (#7 of 7): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
> 13. leaked_storage: Variable chan going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
> 190 return ret;
>
> Fix this by freeing 'chan' in the error path.
>
yeah, this is actually a false positive. I ran your patch through
kasan and got a use-after-free as we deallocate the passed in pointer
after calling the function pointer to the new function. One might
argue that the programming style isn't the best and we should be
explicit about freeing memory though.
> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/ga102.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/ga102.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/ga102.c
> index f897bef13acf..4dbdfb53e65f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/ga102.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/ga102.c
> @@ -175,19 +175,21 @@ ga102_chan_new(struct nvkm_device *device,
> }
> }
>
> - if (!chan->ctrl.runl)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (!chan->ctrl.runl) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto free_chan;
> + }
>
> chan->ctrl.chan = nvkm_rd32(device, chan->ctrl.runl + 0x004) & 0xfffffff0;
> args->token = nvkm_rd32(device, chan->ctrl.runl + 0x008) & 0xffff0000;
>
> ret = nvkm_memory_new(device, NVKM_MEM_TARGET_INST, 0x1000, 0x1000, true, &chan->mthd);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto free_chan;
>
> ret = nvkm_memory_new(device, NVKM_MEM_TARGET_INST, 0x1000, 0x1000, true, &chan->inst);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto free_chan;
>
> nvkm_kmap(chan->inst);
> nvkm_wo32(chan->inst, 0x010, 0x0000face);
> @@ -209,11 +211,11 @@ ga102_chan_new(struct nvkm_device *device,
>
> ret = nvkm_memory_new(device, NVKM_MEM_TARGET_INST, 0x1000, 0x1000, true, &chan->user);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto free_chan;
>
> ret = nvkm_memory_new(device, NVKM_MEM_TARGET_INST, 0x1000, 0x1000, true, &chan->runl);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto free_chan;
>
> nvkm_kmap(chan->runl);
> nvkm_wo32(chan->runl, 0x00, 0x80030001);
> @@ -228,10 +230,14 @@ ga102_chan_new(struct nvkm_device *device,
>
> ret = nvkm_vmm_join(vmm, chan->inst);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto free_chan;
>
> chan->vmm = nvkm_vmm_ref(vmm);
> return 0;
> +
> +free_chan:
> + kfree(chan);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static const struct nvkm_device_oclass
> --
> 2.33.0
>
