Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/26] drm/i915: use the new iterator in i915_sw_fence_await_reservation v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 20.09.21 um 10:47 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:

On 20/09/2021 09:45, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 17/09/2021 13:35, Christian König wrote:
Simplifying the code a bit.

v2: use dma_resv_for_each_fence instead, according to Tvrtko the lock is
     held here anyway.
v3: back to using dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked.

It did not work out - what happened?
Wait, my suggestion to try the locked iterator was against i915_request_await_object. I haven't looked at this one at the time or even now.

Exactly! I've mixed the two up and this one here is really called without holding a lock.

Regards,
Christian.


Regards,

Tvrtko


Regards,

Tvrtko

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c | 57 ++++++++--------------------
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c
index c589a681da77..7635b0478ea5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c
@@ -572,56 +572,29 @@ int i915_sw_fence_await_reservation(struct i915_sw_fence *fence,
                      unsigned long timeout,
                      gfp_t gfp)
  {
-    struct dma_fence *excl;
+    struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
+    struct dma_fence *f;
      int ret = 0, pending;
      debug_fence_assert(fence);
      might_sleep_if(gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp));
-    if (write) {
-        struct dma_fence **shared;
-        unsigned int count, i;
-
-        ret = dma_resv_get_fences(resv, &excl, &count, &shared);
-        if (ret)
-            return ret;
-
-        for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-            if (shared[i]->ops == exclude)
-                continue;
-
-            pending = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(fence,
-                                shared[i],
-                                timeout,
-                                gfp);
-            if (pending < 0) {
-                ret = pending;
-                break;
-            }
-
-            ret |= pending;
-        }
-
-        for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
-            dma_fence_put(shared[i]);
-        kfree(shared);
-    } else {
-        excl = dma_resv_get_excl_unlocked(resv);
-    }
-
-    if (ret >= 0 && excl && excl->ops != exclude) {
-        pending = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(fence,
-                            excl,
-                            timeout,
+    rcu_read_lock();
+    dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, resv, write);
+    dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, f) {
+        rcu_read_unlock();
+        pending = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(fence, f, timeout,
                              gfp);
-        if (pending < 0)
+        rcu_read_lock();
+        if (pending < 0) {
              ret = pending;
-        else
-            ret |= pending;
-    }
-
-    dma_fence_put(excl);
+            break;
+        }
+        ret |= pending;
+    }
+    dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
+    rcu_read_unlock();
      return ret;
  }





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux