Re: [PATCH 03/26] dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_copy_fences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 17.09.21 um 16:35 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:34:50PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
This makes the function much simpler since the complex
retry logic is now handled else where.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
index a3c79a99fb44..406150dea5e4 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
@@ -426,74 +426,58 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_resv_iter_walk);
   */
  int dma_resv_copy_fences(struct dma_resv *dst, struct dma_resv *src)
  {
-	struct dma_resv_list *src_list, *dst_list;
-	struct dma_fence *old, *new;
-	unsigned int i;
+	struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
+	struct dma_resv_list *list;
+	struct dma_fence *f, *excl;
dma_resv_assert_held(dst); - rcu_read_lock();
-	src_list = dma_resv_shared_list(src);
-
-retry:
-	if (src_list) {
-		unsigned int shared_count = src_list->shared_count;
-
-		rcu_read_unlock();
+	list = NULL;
+	excl = NULL;
- dst_list = dma_resv_list_alloc(shared_count);
-		if (!dst_list)
-			return -ENOMEM;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, src, true);
+	dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, f) {
- rcu_read_lock();
-		src_list = dma_resv_shared_list(src);
-		if (!src_list || src_list->shared_count > shared_count) {
-			kfree(dst_list);
-			goto retry;
-		}
+		if (cursor.is_first) {
Maybe have a wrapper for this, like dma_resv_iter_is_reset or is_first or
is_restart (my preference) with some nice docs that this returns true
everytime we had to restart the sequence?

Exactly that's what I wanted to avoid since the is_first (or whatever) function should only be used inside of the dma_resv.c code.

On the other hand I can just make that static here and document that it should never be exported.

Christian.


Otherwise I fully agree, this is so much better with all the hairy
restarting and get_rcu and test_bit shovelled away somewhere.

Either way (but I much prefer a wrapper for is_first):

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>

+			dma_resv_list_free(list);
+			dma_fence_put(excl);
- dst_list->shared_count = 0;
-		for (i = 0; i < src_list->shared_count; ++i) {
-			struct dma_fence __rcu **dst;
-			struct dma_fence *fence;
+			if (cursor.fences) {
+				unsigned int cnt = cursor.fences->shared_count;
- fence = rcu_dereference(src_list->shared[i]);
-			if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
-				     &fence->flags))
-				continue;
+				rcu_read_unlock();
+				list = dma_resv_list_alloc(cnt);
+				if (!list) {
+					dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
+					return -ENOMEM;
+				}
- if (!dma_fence_get_rcu(fence)) {
-				dma_resv_list_free(dst_list);
-				src_list = dma_resv_shared_list(src);
-				goto retry;
-			}
+				list->shared_count = 0;
+				rcu_read_lock();
- if (dma_fence_is_signaled(fence)) {
-				dma_fence_put(fence);
-				continue;
+			} else {
+				list = NULL;
  			}
-
-			dst = &dst_list->shared[dst_list->shared_count++];
-			rcu_assign_pointer(*dst, fence);
+			excl = NULL;
  		}
-	} else {
-		dst_list = NULL;
-	}
- new = dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(&src->fence_excl);
+		dma_fence_get(f);
+		if (dma_resv_iter_is_exclusive(&cursor))
+			excl = f;
+		else
+			RCU_INIT_POINTER(list->shared[list->shared_count++], f);
+	}
+	dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
  	rcu_read_unlock();
- src_list = dma_resv_shared_list(dst);
-	old = dma_resv_excl_fence(dst);
-
  	write_seqcount_begin(&dst->seq);
-	/* write_seqcount_begin provides the necessary memory barrier */
-	RCU_INIT_POINTER(dst->fence_excl, new);
-	RCU_INIT_POINTER(dst->fence, dst_list);
+	excl = rcu_replace_pointer(dst->fence_excl, excl, dma_resv_held(dst));
+	list = rcu_replace_pointer(dst->fence, list, dma_resv_held(dst));
  	write_seqcount_end(&dst->seq);
- dma_resv_list_free(src_list);
-	dma_fence_put(old);
+	dma_resv_list_free(list);
+	dma_fence_put(excl);
return 0;
  }
--
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux