Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v1 09/12] drm/virtio: implement context init: allocate an array of fence contexts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:33 PM Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 6:37 PM Gurchetan Singh
<gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We don't want fences from different 3D contexts (virgl, gfxstream,
> venus) to be on the same timeline.  With explicit context creation,
> we can specify the number of ring each context wants.
>
> Execbuffer can specify which ring to use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Lingfeng Yang <lfy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h   |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> index a5142d60c2fa..cca9ab505deb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>  #define STATE_ERR 2
>
>  #define MAX_CAPSET_ID 63
> +#define MAX_RINGS 64
>
>  struct virtio_gpu_object_params {
>         unsigned long size;
> @@ -263,6 +264,8 @@ struct virtio_gpu_fpriv {
>         uint32_t ctx_id;
>         uint32_t context_init;
>         bool context_created;
> +       uint32_t num_rings;
> +       uint64_t base_fence_ctx;
>         struct mutex context_lock;
>  };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> index f51f3393a194..262f79210283 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         int in_fence_fd = exbuf->fence_fd;
>         int out_fence_fd = -1;
>         void *buf;
> +       uint64_t fence_ctx;
> +       uint32_t ring_idx;
> +
> +       fence_ctx = vgdev->fence_drv.context;
> +       ring_idx = 0;
>
>         if (vgdev->has_virgl_3d == false)
>                 return -ENOSYS;
> @@ -106,6 +111,17 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         if ((exbuf->flags & ~VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> +       if ((exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX)) {
> +               if (exbuf->ring_idx >= vfpriv->num_rings)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +
> +               if (!vfpriv->base_fence_ctx)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +
> +               fence_ctx = vfpriv->base_fence_ctx;
> +               ring_idx = exbuf->ring_idx;
> +       }
> +
>         exbuf->fence_fd = -1;
>
>         virtio_gpu_create_context(dev, file);
> @@ -173,7 +189,7 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>                         goto out_memdup;
>         }
>
> -       out_fence = virtio_gpu_fence_alloc(vgdev, vgdev->fence_drv.context, 0);
> +       out_fence = virtio_gpu_fence_alloc(vgdev, fence_ctx, ring_idx);
>         if(!out_fence) {
>                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>                 goto out_unresv;
> @@ -691,7 +707,7 @@ static int virtio_gpu_context_init_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         /* Number of unique parameters supported at this time. */
> -       if (num_params > 1)
> +       if (num_params > 2)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         ctx_set_params = memdup_user(u64_to_user_ptr(args->ctx_set_params),
> @@ -731,6 +747,20 @@ static int virtio_gpu_context_init_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>
>                         vfpriv->context_init |= value;
>                         break;
> +               case VIRTGPU_CONTEXT_PARAM_NUM_RINGS:
> +                       if (vfpriv->base_fence_ctx) {
> +                               ret = -EINVAL;
> +                               goto out_unlock;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       if (value > MAX_RINGS) {
> +                               ret = -EINVAL;
> +                               goto out_unlock;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       vfpriv->base_fence_ctx = dma_fence_context_alloc(value);
With multiple fence contexts, we should do something about implicit fencing.

The classic example is Mesa and X server.  When both use virgl and the
global fence context, no dma_fence_wait is fine.  But when Mesa uses
venus and the ring fence context, dma_fence_wait should be inserted.

 If I read your comment correctly, the use case is:

context A (venus) 

sharing a render target with

context B (Xserver backed virgl)

?

Which function do you envisage dma_fence_wait(...) to be inserted?  Doesn't implicit synchronization mean there's no fence to share between contexts (only buffer objects)?  

It may be possible to wait on the reservation object associated with a buffer object from a different context (userspace can also do DRM_IOCTL_VIRTGPU_WAIT), but not sure if that's what you're looking for.



> +                       vfpriv->num_rings = value;
> +                       break;
>                 default:
>                         ret = -EINVAL;
>                         goto out_unlock;
> --
> 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux