…whoops, that was supposed to be:
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 12:18 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> I thought I remembered an issue with this but looked up the previous emails,
> and it looks like that this change actually should be safe!
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 15:51 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Extend the use of extended receiver cap at 0x2200 to cover
> > MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_CAP in 0x2206, in case an implementation hides
> > the DP 2.0 128b/132b channel encoding cap.
> >
> > v2: Extend to DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE (Ville)
> >
> > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 9b2a2961fca8..2e74b02ed96b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static u8 drm_dp_downstream_port_count(const u8
> > dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> > static int drm_dp_read_extended_dpcd_caps(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> > u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> > {
> > - u8 dpcd_ext[6];
> > + u8 dpcd_ext[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
> > int ret;
> >
> > /*
>
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
