On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 08:53:56AM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> After commit 928f9e268611 ("clk: fractional-divider: Hide
> clk_fractional_divider_ops from wide audience") was merged it appears
> that the DSI panel on my Odroid Go Advance stopped working. Upon closer
> examination of the problem, it looks like it was the fixup in the
> rockchip_drm_vop.c file was causing the issue. The changes made to the
> clk driver appear to change some assumptions made in the fixup.
>
> After debugging the working 5.14 kernel and the no-longer working
> 5.15 kernel, it looks like this was broken all along but still
> worked, whereas after the fractional clock change it stopped
> working despite the issue (it went from sort-of broken to very broken).
>
> In the 5.14 kernel the dclk_vopb_frac was being requested to be set to
> 17000999 on my board. The clock driver was taking the value of the
> parent clock and attempting to divide the requested value from it
> (17000000/17000999 = 0), then subtracting 1 from it (making it -1),
> and running it through fls_long to get 64. It would then subtract
> the value of fd->mwidth from it to get 48, and then bit shift
> 17000999 to the left by 48, coming up with a very large number of
> 7649082492112076800. This resulted in a numerator of 65535 and a
> denominator of 1 from the clk driver. The driver seemingly would
> try again and get a correct 1:1 value later, and then move on.
>
> Output from my 5.14 kernel (with some printfs for good measure):
> [ 2.830066] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff460000.vop (ops vop_component_ops)
> [ 2.839431] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff450000.dsi (ops dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_ops)
> [ 2.855980] Clock is dclk_vopb_frac
> [ 2.856004] Scale 64, Rate 7649082492112076800, Oldrate 17000999, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 65535, Best Denominator 1, fd->mwidth 16
> [ 2.903529] Clock is dclk_vopb_frac
> [ 2.903556] Scale 0, Rate 17000000, Oldrate 17000000, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 1, Best Denominator 1, fd->mwidth 16
> [ 2.903579] Clock is dclk_vopb_frac
> [ 2.903583] Scale 0, Rate 17000000, Oldrate 17000000, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 1, Best Denominator 1, fd->mwidth 16
>
> Contrast this with 5.15 after the clk change where the rate of 17000999
> was getting passed and resulted in numerators/denomiators of 17001/
> 17000.
>
> Output from my 5.15 kernel (with some printfs added for good measure):
> [ 2.817571] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff460000.vop (ops vop_component_ops)
> [ 2.826975] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff450000.dsi (ops dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_ops)
> [ 2.843430] Rate 17000999, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 17018, Best Denominator 17017
> [ 2.891073] Rate 17001000, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 17001, Best Denominator 17000
> [ 2.891269] Rate 17001000, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 17001, Best Denominator 17000
> [ 2.891281] Rate 17001000, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 17001, Best Denominator 17000
>
> After tracing through the code it appeared that this function here was
> adding a 999 to the requested frequency because of how the clk driver
> was rounding/accepting those frequencies. I believe after the changes
> made in the commit listed above the assumptions listed in this driver
> are no longer true. When I remove the + 999 from the driver the DSI
> panel begins to work again.
>
> Output from my 5.15 kernel with 999 removed (printfs added):
> [ 2.852054] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff460000.vop (ops vop_component_ops)
> [ 2.864483] rockchip-drm display-subsystem: bound ff450000.dsi (ops dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_ops)
> [ 2.880869] Clock is dclk_vopb_frac
> [ 2.880892] Rate 17000000, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 1, Best Denominator 1
> [ 2.928521] Clock is dclk_vopb_frac
> [ 2.928551] Rate 17000000, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 1, Best Denominator 1
> [ 2.928570] Clock is dclk_vopb_frac
> [ 2.928574] Rate 17000000, Parent Rate 17000000, Best Numerator 1, Best Denominator 1
>
> I have tested the change extensively on my Odroid Go Advance (Rockchip
> RK3326) and it appears to work well. However, this change will affect
> all Rockchip SoCs that use this driver so I believe further testing
> is warranted. Please note that without this change I can confirm
> at least all PX30s with DSI panels will stop working with the 5.15
> kernel.
To me it all makes a lot of sense, thank you for deep analysis of the issue!
In any case I think we will need a Fixes tag to something (either one of
clk-fractional-divider.c series or preexisted).
Anyway, FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 21 +++------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> index ba9e14da41b4..bfef4f52dce6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> @@ -1169,31 +1169,16 @@ static bool vop_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> *
> * - DRM works in in kHz.
> * - Clock framework works in Hz.
> - * - Rockchip's clock driver picks the clock rate that is the
> - * same _OR LOWER_ than the one requested.
> *
> * Action plan:
> *
> - * 1. When DRM gives us a mode, we should add 999 Hz to it. That way
> - * if the clock we need is 60000001 Hz (~60 MHz) and DRM tells us to
> - * make 60000 kHz then the clock framework will actually give us
> - * the right clock.
> - *
> - * NOTE: if the PLL (maybe through a divider) could actually make
> - * a clock rate 999 Hz higher instead of the one we want then this
> - * could be a problem. Unfortunately there's not much we can do
> - * since it's baked into DRM to use kHz. It shouldn't matter in
> - * practice since Rockchip PLLs are controlled by tables and
> - * even if there is a divider in the middle I wouldn't expect PLL
> - * rates in the table that are just a few kHz different.
> - *
> - * 2. Get the clock framework to round the rate for us to tell us
> + * 1. Get the clock framework to round the rate for us to tell us
> * what it will actually make.
> *
> - * 3. Store the rounded up rate so that we don't need to worry about
> + * 2. Store the rounded up rate so that we don't need to worry about
> * this in the actual clk_set_rate().
> */
> - rate = clk_round_rate(vop->dclk, adjusted_mode->clock * 1000 + 999);
> + rate = clk_round_rate(vop->dclk, adjusted_mode->clock * 1000);
> adjusted_mode->clock = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, 1000);
>
> return true;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
