From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
Propagating errors to dependent fences is broken and can lead to errors
from one client ending up in another. In commit 3761baae908a ("Revert
"drm/i915: Propagate errors on awaiting already signaled fences""), we
attempted to get rid of fence error propagation but missed the case
added in commit 8e9f84cf5cac ("drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error
status to children on unhold"). Revert that one too. This error was
found by an up-and-coming selftest which triggers a reset during
request cancellation and verifies that subsequent requests complete
successfully.
v2:
(Daniel Vetter)
- Use revert
v3:
(Jason)
- Update commit message
v4 (Daniele):
- fix checkpatch error in commit message.
References: '3761baae908a ("Revert "drm/i915: Propagate errors on awaiting already signaled fences"")'
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index de5f9c86b9a4..cafb0608ffb4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -2140,10 +2140,6 @@ static void __execlists_unhold(struct i915_request *rq)
if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
continue;
- /* Propagate any change in error status */
- if (rq->fence.error)
- i915_request_set_error_once(w, rq->fence.error);
-
if (w->engine != rq->engine)
continue;
--
2.25.1
