On 2021-08-23 22:30, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
This has *NOT* been compile tested because I don't have the needed
configuration.
ssdfs
---
drivers/parport/parport_gsc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/parport/parport_gsc.c b/drivers/parport/parport_gsc.c
index 1e43b3f399a8..db912fa6b6df 100644
--- a/drivers/parport/parport_gsc.c
+++ b/drivers/parport/parport_gsc.c
@@ -390,9 +390,8 @@ static int __exit parport_remove_chip(struct parisc_device *dev)
if (p->irq != PARPORT_IRQ_NONE)
free_irq(p->irq, p);
if (priv->dma_buf)
- pci_free_consistent(priv->dev, PAGE_SIZE,
- priv->dma_buf,
- priv->dma_handle);
+ dma_free_coherent(&priv->dev->dev, PAGE_SIZE,
+ priv->dma_buf, priv->dma_handle);
Hmm, seeing a free on its own made me wonder where the corresponding
alloc was, but on closer inspection it seems there isn't one. AFAICS
priv->dma_buf is only ever assigned with NULL (and priv->dev doesn't
seem to be assigned at all), so this could likely just be removed. In
fact it looks like all the references to DMA in this driver are just
copy-paste from parport_pc and unused.
Robin.
kfree (p->private_data);
parport_put_port(p);
kfree (ops); /* hope no-one cached it */
