Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/etnaviv: reference MMU context when setting up hardware state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lucas

Am Di., 24. Aug. 2021 um 09:54 Uhr schrieb Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 24.08.2021 um 09:24 +0200 schrieb Christian Gmeiner:
> > Am Fr., 20. Aug. 2021 um 22:18 Uhr schrieb Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > > Move the refcount manipulation of the MMU context to the point where the
> > > hardware state is programmed. At that point it is also known if a previous
> > > MMU state is still there, or the state needs to be reprogrammed with a
> > > potentially different context.
> > >
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.4
> > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c      | 24 +++++++++++-----------
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu.c    |  4 ++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu_v2.c |  8 ++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
> > > index f420c4f14657..1fa98ce870f7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
> > > @@ -641,17 +641,19 @@ void etnaviv_gpu_start_fe(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu, u32 address, u16 prefetch)
> > >         gpu->fe_running = true;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static void etnaviv_gpu_start_fe_idleloop(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu)
> > > +static void etnaviv_gpu_start_fe_idleloop(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu,
> > > +                                         struct etnaviv_iommu_context *context)
> > >  {
> > > -       u32 address = etnaviv_cmdbuf_get_va(&gpu->buffer,
> > > -                               &gpu->mmu_context->cmdbuf_mapping);
> > >         u16 prefetch;
> > > +       u32 address;
> > >
> > >         /* setup the MMU */
> > > -       etnaviv_iommu_restore(gpu, gpu->mmu_context);
> > > +       etnaviv_iommu_restore(gpu, context);
> > >
> > >         /* Start command processor */
> > >         prefetch = etnaviv_buffer_init(gpu);
> > > +       address = etnaviv_cmdbuf_get_va(&gpu->buffer,
> > > +                                       &gpu->mmu_context->cmdbuf_mapping);
> > >
> > >         etnaviv_gpu_start_fe(gpu, address, prefetch);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1369,14 +1371,12 @@ struct dma_fence *etnaviv_gpu_submit(struct etnaviv_gem_submit *submit)
> > >                 goto out_unlock;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -       if (!gpu->fe_running) {
> > > -               gpu->mmu_context = etnaviv_iommu_context_get(submit->mmu_context);
> > > -               etnaviv_gpu_start_fe_idleloop(gpu);
> > > -       } else {
> > > -               if (submit->prev_mmu_context)
> > > -                       etnaviv_iommu_context_put(submit->prev_mmu_context);
> > > -               submit->prev_mmu_context = etnaviv_iommu_context_get(gpu->mmu_context);
> > > -       }
> > > +       if (!gpu->fe_running)
> > > +               etnaviv_gpu_start_fe_idleloop(gpu, submit->mmu_context);
> > > +
> > > +       if (submit->prev_mmu_context)
> > > +               etnaviv_iommu_context_put(submit->prev_mmu_context);
> > > +       submit->prev_mmu_context = etnaviv_iommu_context_get(gpu->mmu_context);
> > >
> > >         if (submit->nr_pmrs) {
> > >                 gpu->event[event[1]].sync_point = &sync_point_perfmon_sample_pre;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu.c
> > > index 1a7c89a67bea..afe5dd6a9925 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu.c
> > > @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ static void etnaviv_iommuv1_restore(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu,
> > >         struct etnaviv_iommuv1_context *v1_context = to_v1_context(context);
> > >         u32 pgtable;
> > >
> > > +       if (gpu->mmu_context)
> > > +               etnaviv_iommu_context_put(gpu->mmu_context);
> > > +       gpu->mmu_context = etnaviv_iommu_context_get(context);
> > > +
> > >         /* set base addresses */
> > >         gpu_write(gpu, VIVS_MC_MEMORY_BASE_ADDR_RA, context->global->memory_base);
> > >         gpu_write(gpu, VIVS_MC_MEMORY_BASE_ADDR_FE, context->global->memory_base);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu_v2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu_v2.c
> > > index f8bf488e9d71..d664ae29ae20 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu_v2.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_iommu_v2.c
> > > @@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ static void etnaviv_iommuv2_restore_nonsec(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu,
> > >         if (gpu_read(gpu, VIVS_MMUv2_CONTROL) & VIVS_MMUv2_CONTROL_ENABLE)
> > >                 return;
> > >
> > > +       if (gpu->mmu_context)
> > > +               etnaviv_iommu_context_put(gpu->mmu_context);
> > > +       gpu->mmu_context = etnaviv_iommu_context_get(context);
> > > +
> > >         prefetch = etnaviv_buffer_config_mmuv2(gpu,
> > >                                 (u32)v2_context->mtlb_dma,
> > >                                 (u32)context->global->bad_page_dma);
> > > @@ -192,6 +196,10 @@ static void etnaviv_iommuv2_restore_sec(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu,
> > >         if (gpu_read(gpu, VIVS_MMUv2_SEC_CONTROL) & VIVS_MMUv2_SEC_CONTROL_ENABLE)
> > >                 return;
> > >
> > > +       if (gpu->mmu_context)
> > > +               etnaviv_iommu_context_put(gpu->mmu_context);
> > > +       gpu->mmu_context = etnaviv_iommu_context_get(context);
> > > +
> >
> > I have seen this pattern now more than two times - maybe put the
> > assignment of a new mmu context into its own function?
> >
> Yea, I thought about having some Gallium style reference handling
> functions, but that would change the code even more. Since I intend to
> have this series go into stable I wanted to keep the changes to a
> minimum for now. I was already on the fence with the first patch in
> this series, but that one provides very obvious legibility
> improvements, making it easier to review this series.
>
> Would you agree to leave it like that for the stable series and clean
> it up in a follow up change?
>

Sure... sounds like a good plan.

-- 
greets
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc

https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux