Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: And destination bounds checking to struct copy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On August 22, 2021 11:28:54 PM PDT, "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>Am 19.08.21 um 22:14 schrieb Kees Cook:
>> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> index 96e895d6be35..4605934a4fb7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> @@ -1446,4 +1446,29 @@ static inline int amdgpu_in_reset(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>   {
>>   	return atomic_read(&adev->in_gpu_reset);
>>   }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * memcpy_trailing - Copy the end of one structure into the middle of another
>> + *
>> + * @dst: Pointer to destination struct
>> + * @first_dst_member: The member name in @dst where the overwrite begins
>> + * @last_dst_member: The member name in @dst where the overwrite ends after
>> + * @src: Pointer to the source struct
>> + * @first_src_member: The member name in @src where the copy begins
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#define memcpy_trailing(dst, first_dst_member, last_dst_member,		   \
>> +		        src, first_src_member)				   \
>
>Please don't add a function like this into amdgpu.h, especially when it 
>is only used by the SMU code.

Sure, I'm happy to move it. It wasn't clear to me which headers were considered "immutable". Which header should I put this in?

>And please give it an amdgpu_ prefix so that we are not confusing it 
>with a core function.

Sure, I will include that.

>Apart from that looks good to me.

Thanks!

-Kees




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux