Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: Add YAML bindings for NVDEC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/18/21 12:20 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 01:50:28PM +0300, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
Add YAML device tree bindings for NVDEC, now in a more appropriate
place compared to the old textual Host1x bindings.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3:
* Drop host1x bindings
* Change read2 to read-1 in interconnect names
v2:
* Fix issues pointed out in v1
* Add T194 nvidia,instance property
---
  .../gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml     | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
  MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
  2 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..571849625da8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml#";
+$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#";
+
+title: Device tree binding for NVIDIA Tegra NVDEC
+
+description: |
+  NVDEC is the hardware video decoder present on NVIDIA Tegra210
+  and newer chips. It is located on the Host1x bus and typically
+  programmed through Host1x channels.
+
+maintainers:
+  - Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxx>
+  - Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
+
+properties:
+  $nodename:
+    pattern: "^nvdec@[0-9a-f]*$"
+
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - nvidia,tegra210-nvdec
+      - nvidia,tegra186-nvdec
+      - nvidia,tegra194-nvdec
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: nvdec
+
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  reset-names:
+    items:
+      - const: nvdec
+
+  power-domains:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  iommus:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  interconnects:
+    items:
+      - description: DMA read memory client
+      - description: DMA read 2 memory client
+      - description: DMA write memory client
+
+  interconnect-names:
+    items:
+      - const: dma-mem
+      - const: read-1
+      - const: write
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+  - resets
+  - reset-names
+  - power-domains
+
+if:
+  properties:
+    compatible:
+      contains:
+        const: nvidia,tegra194-host1x

host1x? This will never be true as the schema is only applied to nodes
with the nvdec compatible.

Argh, it's a typo indeed. Should be nvidia,tegra194-nvdec.


+then:
+  properties:
+    nvidia,instance:
+      items:
+        - description: 0 for NVDEC0, or 1 for NVDEC1

What's this for? We generally don't do indices in DT.

When programming the hardware through Host1x, we need to know the "class ID" of the hardware, specific to each instance. So we need to know which instance it is. Technically of course we could derive this from the MMIO address but that seems more confusing.


+
+additionalProperties: true

This should be false or 'unevaluatedProperties: false'

I tried that but it resulted in validation failures; please see the discussion in v2.

Thanks,
Mikko


Rob




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux