On 2021.08.16 19:34:58 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:26:06PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > On 2021.08.03 11:30:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:43:15PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for this effort! > > > > > > Great, do we have a submission plan for this? how much does it clash > > > with my open_device/etc patch? ie does the whole thing have to go > > > through the vfio tree? > > > > > > > I think Alex would determine when to merge open_device series, gvt part > > can be through vfio tree without problem. For this refactor, I would first > > merge for gvt staging to do more regression testing before sending through > > i915 tree. > > Any updates on this? I'd really hate to miss this merge window. I'm still waiting for our validation team's report on this. I'm afraid it might be missing for next version as i915 merge window is mostly till rc5...and for any change outside of gvt, it still needs to be acked by i915 maintainers.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature