On 27/07/2021 22.57, Kees Cook wrote: > In order to have a regular programmatic way to describe a struct > region that can be used for references and sizing, can be examined for > bounds checking, avoids forcing the use of intermediate identifiers, > and avoids polluting the global namespace, introduce the struct_group() > macro. This macro wraps the member declarations to create an anonymous > union of an anonymous struct (no intermediate name) and a named struct > (for references and sizing): > > struct foo { > int one; > struct_group(thing, > int two, > int three, > ); > int four; > }; That example won't compile, the commas after two and three should be semicolons. And your implementation relies on MEMBERS not containing any comma tokens, but as int a, b, c, d; is a valid way to declare multiple members, consider making MEMBERS variadic #define struct_group(NAME, MEMBERS...) to have it slurp up every subsequent argument and make that work. > > Co-developed-by: Keith Packard <keithpac@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithpac@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/stddef.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Bikeshedding a bit, but do we need to add 34 lines that need to be preprocessed to virtually each and every translation unit [as opposed to adding a struct_group.h header]? Oh well, you need it for struct skbuff.h, so it would be pulled in by a lot regardless :( Rasmus