On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:01:18PM -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
>
> On 7/27/2021 5:20 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:07:52PM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> > > The assumption when it was added was there would be no wakerefs
> > > held. However, if we fail to enable SLPC, we will still be
> > > holding a wakeref.
> > >
> >
> > So this is if intel_guc_slpc_enable() fails, right? Not seeing where the
> > wakeref is taken. It also seems wrong not to drop the wakeref before
> > calling intel_guc_submission_disable, hence the GEM_BUG_ON in this
> > function.
> >
> > Can you explain this bit more?
>
> I should change the desc a little. The BUG_ON assumed GT would not be awake
> i.e at shutdown, and there would be 0 GT_PM references. However, this
> slpc_enable is in gt_resume path (gt_init_hw calls uc_init_hw). Here,
> gt_pm_get reference is held, so it will result in BUG_ON when
> submission_disable is called.
>
Ok, I see the code path. With a better commit message:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks,
> Vinay.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 4 ----
> > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > index b6338742a594..48cbd800ca54 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > @@ -2523,10 +2523,6 @@ void intel_guc_submission_enable(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > > void intel_guc_submission_disable(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > > {
> > > - struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> > > -
> > > - GEM_BUG_ON(gt->awake); /* GT should be parked first */
> > > -
> > > /* Note: By the time we're here, GuC may have already been reset */
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.25.0
> > >
