Hi Jason, Thank you for your patch. Missatge de jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> del dia dj., 22 de jul. 2021 a les 11:26: > > There are 2 display hardware path in mt8195, namely vdosys0 and > vdosys1, so add their definition in mtk-mmsys documentation. > Just having 2 display hardware paths is not a reason to have two compatibles, isn't the IP block the same? Why do you need to introduce the two compatibles? Thanks, Enric > Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > this patch is base on [1][2] > > [1] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: convert to YAML format > - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210519161847.3747352-1-fparent@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [2] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add MT8365 SoC binding > - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210519161847.3747352-2-fparent@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml > index 2d4ff0ce387b..0789a9614f12 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml > @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ properties: > - mediatek,mt8173-mmsys > - mediatek,mt8183-mmsys > - mediatek,mt8365-mmsys > + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0 > + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1 > - const: syscon > - items: > - const: mediatek,mt7623-mmsys > -- > 2.18.0 >
