Hi Maxime, On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 7:15 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Display drivers so far need to have a lot of boilerplate to first > retrieve either the panel or bridge that they are connected to using > drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(), and then either deal with each with ad-hoc > functions or create a drm panel bridge through drm_panel_bridge_add. Correct, but drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge is still required in some DSI drivers where the panel pointer required separately. > > In order to reduce the boilerplate and hopefully create a path of least > resistance towards using the DRM panel bridge layer, let's create the > function devm_drm_of_get_next to reduce that boilerplate. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 3 ++ > include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > index 044acd07c153..aef8c9f4fb9f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > @@ -24,10 +24,12 @@ > #include <linux/err.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/mutex.h> > +#include <linux/of_graph.h> > > #include <drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.h> > #include <drm/drm_bridge.h> > #include <drm/drm_encoder.h> > +#include <drm/drm_panel.h> > > #include "drm_crtc_internal.h" > > @@ -50,10 +52,8 @@ > * > * Display drivers are responsible for linking encoders with the first bridge > * in the chains. This is done by acquiring the appropriate bridge with > - * of_drm_find_bridge() or drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(), or creating it for a > - * panel with drm_panel_bridge_add_typed() (or the managed version > - * devm_drm_panel_bridge_add_typed()). Once acquired, the bridge shall be > - * attached to the encoder with a call to drm_bridge_attach(). > + * drm_of_get_next(). Once acquired, the bridge shall be attached to the > + * encoder with a call to drm_bridge_attach(). > * > * Bridges are responsible for linking themselves with the next bridge in the > * chain, if any. This is done the same way as for encoders, with the call to > @@ -1223,6 +1223,60 @@ struct drm_bridge *of_drm_find_bridge(struct device_node *np) > return NULL; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_drm_find_bridge); > + > +/** > + * devm_drm_of_get_next - Return next bridge in the chain > + * @dev: device to tie the bridge lifetime to > + * @np: device tree node containing encoder output ports > + * @port: port in the device tree node > + * @endpoint: endpoint in the device tree node > + * > + * Given a DT node's port and endpoint number, finds the connected node > + * and returns the associated bridge if any, or creates and returns a > + * drm panel bridge instance if a panel is connected. > + * > + * Returns a pointer to the bridge if successful, or an error pointer > + * otherwise. > + */ > +struct drm_bridge *devm_drm_of_get_next(struct device *dev, > + struct device_node *np, > + unsigned int port, > + unsigned int endpoint) > +{ > + struct device_node *remote; > + struct drm_bridge *bridge; > + struct drm_panel *panel; > + > + /* > + * of_graph_get_remote_node() produces a noisy error message if port > + * node isn't found and the absence of the port is a legit case here, > + * so at first we silently check whether graph presents in the > + * device-tree node. > + */ > + if (!of_graph_is_present(np)) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > + > + remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, port, endpoint); > + if (!remote) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > + > + bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote); > + if (bridge) { > + of_node_put(remote); > + return bridge; > + } > + > + panel = of_drm_find_panel(remote); > + if (IS_ERR(panel)) { > + of_node_put(remote); > + return ERR_CAST(panel); > + } > + > + of_node_put(remote); > + > + return devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dev, panel); > +} This is ideally similar to drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge followed by panel_bridge_add. Can we reuse drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge for now till it deprecated? Thanks, Jagan.