On 10.07.2021 03:20, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Add methods for interacting with guc for enabling SLPC. Enable
> SLPC after guc submission has been established. GuC load will
s/guc/GuC
> fail if SLPC cannot be successfully initialized. Add various
> helper methods to set/unset the parameters for SLPC. They can
> be set using h2g calls or directly setting bits in the shared
/h2g/H2G
> data structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 221 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 4 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 10 +
> 3 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> index 94e2f19951aa..e579408d1c19 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,61 @@ static inline struct intel_guc *slpc_to_guc(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> return container_of(slpc, struct intel_guc, slpc);
> }
>
> +static inline struct intel_gt *slpc_to_gt(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> + return guc_to_gt(slpc_to_guc(slpc));
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct drm_i915_private *slpc_to_i915(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> + return (slpc_to_gt(slpc))->i915;
> +}
> +
> +static void slpc_mem_set_param(struct slpc_shared_data *data,
> + u32 id, u32 value)
> +{
> + GEM_BUG_ON(id >= SLPC_MAX_OVERRIDE_PARAMETERS);
> + /* When the flag bit is set, corresponding value will be read
> + * and applied by slpc.
fix format of multi-line comment
s/slpc/SLPC
> + */
> + data->override_params_set_bits[id >> 5] |= (1 << (id % 32));
use __set_bit instead
> + data->override_params_values[id] = value;
> +}
> +
> +static void slpc_mem_unset_param(struct slpc_shared_data *data,
> + u32 id)
> +{
> + GEM_BUG_ON(id >= SLPC_MAX_OVERRIDE_PARAMETERS);
> + /* When the flag bit is unset, corresponding value will not be
> + * read by slpc.
> + */
> + data->override_params_set_bits[id >> 5] &= (~(1 << (id % 32)));
same here
> + data->override_params_values[id] = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void slpc_mem_task_control(struct slpc_shared_data *data,
> + u64 val, u32 enable_id, u32 disable_id)
hmm, u64 to pass simple tri-state flag ?
> +{
> + /* Enabling a param involves setting the enable_id
> + * to 1 and disable_id to 0. Setting it to default
> + * will unset both enable and disable ids and let
> + * slpc choose it's default values.
fix format + s/slpc/SLPC
> + */
> + if (val == SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DEFAULT) {
> + /* set default */
> + slpc_mem_unset_param(data, enable_id);
> + slpc_mem_unset_param(data, disable_id);
> + } else if (val == SLPC_PARAM_TASK_ENABLED) {
> + /* set enable */
> + slpc_mem_set_param(data, enable_id, 1);
> + slpc_mem_set_param(data, disable_id, 0);
> + } else if (val == SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLED) {
> + /* set disable */
> + slpc_mem_set_param(data, disable_id, 1);
> + slpc_mem_set_param(data, enable_id, 0);
> + }
maybe instead of SLPC_PARAM_TASK_* flags (that btw were confusing me
earlier) you can define 3x small helpers:
static void slpc_mem_set_default(data, enable_id, disable_id);
static void slpc_mem_set_enabled(data, enable_id, disable_id);
static void slpc_mem_set_disabled(data, enable_id, disable_id);
> +}
> +
> static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> {
> struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
> @@ -34,6 +89,128 @@ static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> return err;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Send SLPC event to guc
> + *
> + */
> +static int slpc_send(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc,
> + struct slpc_event_input *input,
> + u32 in_len)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
> + u32 *action;
> +
> + action = (u32 *)input;
> + action[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SLPC_REQUEST;
why not just updating input->h2g_action_id ?
> +
> + return intel_guc_send(guc, action, in_len);
> +}
> +
> +static bool slpc_running(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> + struct slpc_shared_data *data;
> + u32 slpc_global_state;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
> +
> + drm_clflush_virt_range(slpc->vaddr, sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
do you really need to flush all 8K of shared data?
it looks that you only need single u32
> + data = slpc->vaddr;
> +
> + slpc_global_state = data->global_state;
> +
> + return (data->global_state == SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING);
> +}
> +
> +static int host2guc_slpc_query_task_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
> + u32 shared_data_gtt_offset = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, slpc->vma);
> + struct slpc_event_input data = {0};
> +
> + data.header.value = SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_QUERY_TASK_STATE, 2);
you defined header.num_args and header.event_id, don't want to use them?
> + data.args[0] = shared_data_gtt_offset;
> + data.args[1] = 0;
> +
> + return slpc_send(slpc, &data, 4);
magic 4
> +}
> +
> +static int slpc_read_task_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> + return host2guc_slpc_query_task_state(slpc);
> +}
hmm, all this looks complicated more than needed, why not just:
static int guc_action_slpc_query(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 offset)
{
u32 request[] = {
INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SLPC_REQUEST,
SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_QUERY_TASK_STATE, 2),
offset,
0,
};
int err;
return intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request));
}
static int slpc_query_task_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
u32 offset = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, slpc->vma);
return guc_action_slpc_query(guc, offset);
}
btw, there is little magic in H2G data, as only event enums were defined
in slpc_fwif.h (or slpc_abi.h) but it looks that len and format of args
depends on the actual event used
> +
> +static const char *slpc_state_stringify(enum slpc_global_state state)
> +{
> + const char *str = NULL;
> +
> + switch (state) {
> + case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_NOT_RUNNING:
> + str = "not running";
> + break;
> + case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_INITIALIZING:
> + str = "initializing";
> + break;
> + case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RESETTING:
> + str = "resetting";
> + break;
> + case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING:
> + str = "running";
> + break;
> + case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_SHUTTING_DOWN:
> + str = "shutting down";
> + break;
> + case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_ERROR:
> + str = "error";
> + break;
> + default:
> + str = "unknown";
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return str;
> +}
> +
> +static const char *get_slpc_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
lot of duplicated code with slpc_running()
maybe there should be:
u32 slpc_get_state(slpc);
bool slpc_is_running(slpc);
const char *slpc_state_string(slpc);
> +{
> + struct slpc_shared_data *data;
> + u32 slpc_global_state;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
> +
> + drm_clflush_virt_range(slpc->vaddr, sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
> + data = slpc->vaddr;
> +
> + slpc_global_state = data->global_state;
> +
> + return slpc_state_stringify(slpc_global_state);
> +}
> +
> +static int host2guc_slpc_reset(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
> + u32 shared_data_gtt_offset = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, slpc->vma);
> + struct slpc_event_input data = {0};
> + int ret;
> +
> + data.header.value = SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_RESET, 2);
> + data.args[0] = shared_data_gtt_offset;
> + data.args[1] = 0;
> +
> + /* TODO: Hardcoded 4 needs define */
> + ret = slpc_send(slpc, &data, 4);
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + /* TODO: How long to Wait until SLPC is running */
do we know state transitions ?
maybe there is no point in waiting for RUNNING if it is in ERROR or
SHUTTING_DOWN ?
> + if (wait_for(slpc_running(slpc), 5)) {
magic 5
> + DRM_ERROR("SLPC not enabled! State = %s\n",
use drm_err
> + get_slpc_state(slpc));
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> {
> GEM_BUG_ON(slpc->vma);
> @@ -56,6 +233,50 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> */
> int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
> + struct slpc_shared_data *data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
> +
> + memset(slpc->vaddr, 0, sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
> +
> + data = slpc->vaddr;
> + data->shared_data_size = sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data);
> +
> + /* Enable only GTPERF task, Disable others */
> + slpc_mem_task_control(data, SLPC_PARAM_TASK_ENABLED,
> + SLPC_PARAM_TASK_ENABLE_GTPERF,
> + SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLE_GTPERF);
> +
> + slpc_mem_task_control(data, SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLED,
> + SLPC_PARAM_TASK_ENABLE_BALANCER,
> + SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLE_BALANCER);
> +
> + slpc_mem_task_control(data, SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLED,
> + SLPC_PARAM_TASK_ENABLE_DCC,
> + SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLE_DCC);
> +
> + ret = host2guc_slpc_reset(slpc);
> + if (ret) {
> + drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC Reset event returned %d", ret);
you may want to print error as %pe
missing \n
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + DRM_INFO("SLPC state: %s\n", get_slpc_state(slpc));
use drm_info
> +
> + if (slpc_read_task_state(slpc))
> + drm_err(&i915->drm, "Unable to read task state data");
missing \n
> +
> + drm_clflush_virt_range(slpc->vaddr, sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
> +
> + /* min and max frequency limits being used by SLPC */
> + drm_info(&i915->drm, "SLPC min freq: %u Mhz, max is %u Mhz",
missing \n
> + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(data->task_state_data.min_unslice_freq *
> + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, GEN9_FREQ_SCALER),
> + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(data->task_state_data.max_unslice_freq *
> + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, GEN9_FREQ_SCALER));
this info/code seems to be duplicated in patch 10/16
maybe just call intel_guc_slpc_info() here once available ?
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index e2644a05f298..3e76d4d5f7bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -2321,10 +2321,6 @@ void intel_guc_submission_enable(struct intel_guc *guc)
>
> void intel_guc_submission_disable(struct intel_guc *guc)
> {
> - struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> -
> - GEM_BUG_ON(gt->awake); /* GT should be parked first */
if not mistake, can you explain why it was removed ?
> -
> /* Note: By the time we're here, GuC may have already been reset */
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> index dca5f6d0641b..7b6c767d3eb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> @@ -501,6 +501,14 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
> if (intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(uc))
> intel_guc_submission_enable(guc);
>
> + if (intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(uc)) {
> + ret = intel_guc_slpc_enable(&guc->slpc);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_submission;
> + drm_info(&i915->drm, "GuC SLPC %s\n",
> + enableddisabled(intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(uc)));
move this drm_info after below GuC report and/or modify to have:
"GuC firmware path.bin version 1.0 loaded:yes"
"GuC submission:enabled"
"GuC SLPC:enabled"
"HuC firmware path.bin version 1.0 authenticated:yes"
Michal
> + }
> +
> drm_info(&i915->drm, "%s firmware %s version %u.%u %s:%s\n",
> intel_uc_fw_type_repr(INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC), guc->fw.path,
> guc->fw.major_ver_found, guc->fw.minor_ver_found,
> @@ -521,6 +529,8 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
> /*
> * We've failed to load the firmware :(
> */
> +err_submission:
> + intel_guc_submission_disable(guc);
> err_log_capture:
> __uc_capture_load_err_log(uc);
> err_out:
>
