Hi
just a small update, added debug in the vendor-specific functions for page_flip and vblank and it seems they never get called
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
@@ -87,21 +87,25 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_finish_page_flip(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc)
{
struct drm_crtc *crtc = &mtk_crtc->base;
unsigned long flags;
-
+printk(KERN_ALERT "DEBUG: Passed %s %d \n",__FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
spin_lock_irqsave(&crtc->dev->event_lock, flags);
drm_crtc_send_vblank_event(crtc, mtk_crtc->event);
drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
mtk_crtc->event = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&crtc->dev->event_lock, flags);
+printk(KERN_ALERT "DEBUG: Passed %s %d \n",__FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
}
static void mtk_drm_finish_page_flip(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc)
{
+printk(KERN_ALERT "DEBUG: Passed %s %d update:%d,needsvblank:%d\n",__FUNCTION__,__LINE__,mtk_crtc->config_updating,mtk_crtc->pending_needs_vblank);
drm_crtc_handle_vblank(&mtk_crtc->base);
if (!mtk_crtc->config_updating && mtk_crtc->pending_needs_vblank) {
+printk(KERN_ALERT "DEBUG: Passed %s %d \n",__FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
mtk_drm_crtc_finish_page_flip(mtk_crtc);
mtk_crtc->pending_needs_vblank = false;
}
+printk(KERN_ALERT "DEBUG: Passed %s %d \n",__FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
}
static void mtk_drm_crtc_destroy(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
finish_page_flip is called by mtk_crtc_ddp_irq. this seems to be set in mtk_drm_crtc_enable_vblank with mtk_ddp_comp_enable_vblank. this is called correctly
113 static inline void mtk_ddp_comp_enable_vblank(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp,
114 void (*vblank_cb)(void *),
115 void *vblank_cb_data)
116 {
117 printk(KERN_ALERT "DEBUG: Passed %s %d \n",__FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
118 if (comp->funcs && comp->funcs->enable_vblank)
119 {
120 comp->funcs->enable_vblank(comp->dev, vblank_cb, vblank_cb_data);
121 printk(KERN_ALERT "DEBUG: Passed %s %d \n",__FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
122 }
123 }
i see both messages, but mtk_crtc_ddp_irq is never called and so the other 2 not.
root@bpi-r2:~# dmesg | grep -i DEBUG
[ 6.433509] DEBUG: Passed mtk_drm_crtc_enable_vblank 510
[ 6.433530] DEBUG: Passed mtk_ddp_comp_enable_vblank 117
[ 6.433537] DEBUG: Passed mtk_ddp_comp_enable_vblank 121 <<<
comp->funcs->enable_vblank should be mtk_drm_crtc_enable_vblank, right?
641 static const struct drm_crtc_funcs mtk_crtc_funcs = {
642 .set_config = drm_atomic_helper_set_config,
643 .page_flip = drm_atomic_helper_page_flip,
644 .destroy = mtk_drm_crtc_destroy,
645 .reset = mtk_drm_crtc_reset,
646 .atomic_duplicate_state = mtk_drm_crtc_duplicate_state,
647 .atomic_destroy_state = mtk_drm_crtc_destroy_state,
648 .enable_vblank = mtk_drm_crtc_enable_vblank, <<<<<<<
649 .disable_vblank = mtk_drm_crtc_disable_vblank,
650 };
but it looks like a recursion:
mtk_drm_crtc_enable_vblank calls mtk_ddp_comp_enable_vblank => enable_vblank (=mtk_drm_crtc_enable_vblank), but i see the messages not repeating
mtk_drm_crtc_enable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
511 mtk_ddp_comp_enable_vblank(comp, mtk_crtc_ddp_irq, &mtk_crtc->base);
113 static inline void mtk_ddp_comp_enable_vblank(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp,
114 void (*vblank_cb)(void *),
115 void *vblank_cb_data)
116 {
118 if (comp->funcs && comp->funcs->enable_vblank)
120 comp->funcs->enable_vblank(comp->dev, vblank_cb, vblank_cb_data);
but params do not match...comp->funcs->enable_vblank takes 3 arguments but comp->funcs->enable_vblank has only one.something i miss here...
i guess not, but is watchdog somehow involved? i ask because i see this on reboot/poweroff:
"watchdog: watchdog0: watchdog did not stop!"
i see this with my 5.13, 5.12-drm (5.12.0+mtk/core drm-patches) and 5.12.14 too (hdmi is working there), but not 5.12.0!
that means something in drm-patches (mtk/core) breaks watchdog. maybe the recursion mentioned above?
regards Frank
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 08. Juli 2021 um 09:22 Uhr
> Von: "Dafna Hirschfeld" <dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Frank,
>
>
> On 06.07.21 11:54, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i've noticed that HDMI is broken at least on my board (Bananapi-r2,mt7623) on 5.13.
> >
> > after some research i noticed that it is working till
> >
> > commit 2e477391522354e763aa62ee3e281c1ad9e8eb1b
> > Author: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We also encountered that warning on mt8173 device - Acer Chromebook R13. It happen after resuming from suspend to ram.
> We could not find a version that works and we were not able to find the fix of the bug.
> It seems like the irq isr is not called after resuming from suspend.
> Please share if you have new findings regarding that bug.
>
> Thanks,
> Dafna
