On 6/24/2021 00:04, Matthew Brost wrote:
Implement GuC submission tasklet for new interface. The new GuC
interface uses H2G to submit contexts to the GuC. Since H2G use a single
channel, a single tasklet submits is used for the submission path.
Re-word? 'a single tasklet submits is used...' doesn't make sense.
Also the per engine interrupt handler has been updated to disable the
rescheduling of the physical engine tasklet, when using GuC scheduling,
as the physical engine tasklet is no longer used.
In this patch the field, guc_id, has been added to intel_context and is
not assigned. Patches later in the series will assign this value.
Cc: John Harrison<john.c.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost<matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 9 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 4 +
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 231 +++++++++---------
3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
index ed8c447a7346..bb6fef7eae52 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
@@ -136,6 +136,15 @@ struct intel_context {
struct intel_sseu sseu;
u8 wa_bb_page; /* if set, page num reserved for context workarounds */
+
+ /* GuC scheduling state that does not require a lock. */
Maybe 'GuC scheduling state flags that do not require a lock'? Otherwise
it just looks like a counter or something.
+ atomic_t guc_sched_state_no_lock;
+
+ /*
+ * GuC lrc descriptor ID - Not assigned in this patch but future patches
Not a blocker but s/lrc/LRC/ would keep Michal happy ;). Although
presumably this comment is at least being amended by later patches in
the series.
+ * in the series will.
+ */
+ u16 guc_id;
};
#endif /* __INTEL_CONTEXT_TYPES__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
index 2313d9fc087b..9ba8219475b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ struct intel_guc {
struct intel_guc_log log;
struct intel_guc_ct ct;
+ /* Global engine used to submit requests to GuC */
+ struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine;
+ struct i915_request *stalled_request;
+
/* intel_guc_recv interrupt related state */
spinlock_t irq_lock;
unsigned int msg_enabled_mask;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index 23a94a896a0b..ee933efbf0ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -60,6 +60,31 @@
#define GUC_REQUEST_SIZE 64 /* bytes */
+/*
+ * Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which do
+ * not require a lock as all state transitions are mutually exclusive. i.e. It
+ * is not possible for the context pinning code and submission, for the same
+ * context, to be executing simultaneously. We still need an atomic as it is
+ * possible for some of the bits to changing at the same time though.
+ */
+#define SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED BIT(0)
+static inline bool context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+ return (atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock) &
+ SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED);
+}
+
+static inline void set_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+ atomic_or(SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED, &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void clr_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+ atomic_and((u32)~SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED,
+ &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
+}
+
static inline struct i915_priolist *to_priolist(struct rb_node *rb)
{
return rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node);
@@ -122,37 +147,29 @@ static inline void set_lrc_desc_registered(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 id,
xa_store_irq(&guc->context_lookup, id, ce, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
-static void guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
+static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
{
- /* Leaving stub as this function will be used in future patches */
-}
+ int err;
+ struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
+ u32 action[3];
+ int len = 0;
+ bool enabled = context_enabled(ce);
-/*
- * When we're doing submissions using regular execlists backend, writing to
- * ELSP from CPU side is enough to make sure that writes to ringbuffer pages
- * pinned in mappable aperture portion of GGTT are visible to command streamer.
- * Writes done by GuC on our behalf are not guaranteeing such ordering,
- * therefore, to ensure the flush, we're issuing a POSTING READ.
- */
-static void flush_ggtt_writes(struct i915_vma *vma)
-{
- if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma))
- intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(vma->vm->gt->uncore,
- GUC_STATUS);
-}
+ if (!enabled) {
+ action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET;
+ action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
+ action[len++] = GUC_CONTEXT_ENABLE;
+ } else {
+ action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT;
+ action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
+ }
-static void guc_submit(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- struct i915_request **out,
- struct i915_request **end)
-{
- struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
+ err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
- do {
- struct i915_request *rq = *out++;
+ if (!enabled && !err)
+ set_context_enabled(ce);
- flush_ggtt_writes(rq->ring->vma);
- guc_add_request(guc, rq);
- } while (out != end);
+ return err;
}
static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
@@ -160,125 +177,88 @@ static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
return rq->sched.attr.priority;
}
-static struct i915_request *schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq, int idx)
+static int guc_dequeue_one_context(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
- trace_i915_request_in(rq, idx);
-
- /*
- * Currently we are not tracking the rq->context being inflight
- * (ce->inflight = rq->engine). It is only used by the execlists
- * backend at the moment, a similar counting strategy would be
- * required if we generalise the inflight tracking.
- */
-
- __intel_gt_pm_get(rq->engine->gt);
- return i915_request_get(rq);
-}
-
-static void schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
-{
- trace_i915_request_out(rq);
-
- intel_gt_pm_put_async(rq->engine->gt);
- i915_request_put(rq);
-}
-
-static void __guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
-{
- struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
- struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = engine->sched_engine;
- struct i915_request **first = execlists->inflight;
- struct i915_request ** const last_port = first + execlists->port_mask;
- struct i915_request *last = first[0];
- struct i915_request **port;
+ struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = guc->sched_engine;
+ struct i915_request *last = NULL;
bool submit = false;
struct rb_node *rb;
+ int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&sched_engine->lock);
- if (last) {
- if (*++first)
- return;
-
- last = NULL;
+ if (guc->stalled_request) {
+ submit = true;
+ last = guc->stalled_request;
+ goto resubmit;
}
- /*
- * We write directly into the execlists->inflight queue and don't use
- * the execlists->pending queue, as we don't have a distinct switch
- * event.
- */
- port = first;
while ((rb = rb_first_cached(&sched_engine->queue))) {
struct i915_priolist *p = to_priolist(rb);
struct i915_request *rq, *rn;
priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p) {
- if (last && rq->context != last->context) {
- if (port == last_port)
- goto done;
-
- *port = schedule_in(last,
- port - execlists->inflight);
- port++;
- }
+ if (last && rq->context != last->context)
+ goto done;
list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
+
__i915_request_submit(rq);
- submit = true;
+
+ trace_i915_request_in(rq, 0);
last = rq;
+ submit = true;
}
rb_erase_cached(&p->node, &sched_engine->queue);
i915_priolist_free(p);
}
done:
- sched_engine->queue_priority_hint =
- rb ? to_priolist(rb)->priority : INT_MIN;
if (submit) {
- *port = schedule_in(last, port - execlists->inflight);
- *++port = NULL;
- guc_submit(engine, first, port);
+ last->context->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] =
+ intel_ring_set_tail(last->ring, last->tail);
+resubmit:
+ /*
+ * We only check for -EBUSY here even though it is possible for
+ * -EDEADLK to be returned. If -EDEADLK is returned, the GuC has
+ * died and a full GPU needs to be done. The hangcheck will
'full GPU reset'. Although I believe strictly speaking, it is a 'full GT
reset'. There are other bits of the GPU beyond the GT.
+ * eventually detect that the GuC has died and trigger this
+ * reset so no need to handle -EDEADLK here.
+ */
+ ret = guc_add_request(guc, last);
+ if (ret == -EBUSY) {
+ tasklet_schedule(&sched_engine->tasklet);
+ guc->stalled_request = last;
+ return false;
+ }
}
- execlists->active = execlists->inflight;
+
+ guc->stalled_request = NULL;
+ return submit;
}
static void guc_submission_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine =
from_tasklet(sched_engine, t, tasklet);
- struct intel_engine_cs * const engine = sched_engine->private_data;
- struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
- struct i915_request **port, *rq;
unsigned long flags;
+ bool loop;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
-
- for (port = execlists->inflight; (rq = *port); port++) {
- if (!i915_request_completed(rq))
- break;
-
- schedule_out(rq);
- }
- if (port != execlists->inflight) {
- int idx = port - execlists->inflight;
- int rem = ARRAY_SIZE(execlists->inflight) - idx;
- memmove(execlists->inflight, port, rem * sizeof(*port));
- }
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
- __guc_dequeue(engine);
+ do {
+ loop = guc_dequeue_one_context(sched_engine->private_data);
+ } while (loop);
- i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(engine->sched_engine);
+ i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(sched_engine);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
}
Not a blocker but it has to be said that it would be much easier to
remove all of the above if the delete was split into a separate patch.
Having two completely disparate threads of code interwoven in the diff
makes it much harder to see what the new version is doing!
static void cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u16 iir)
{
- if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT) {
+ if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT)
intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(engine);
- tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet);
- }
}
static void guc_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -349,6 +329,10 @@ static void guc_reset_cancel(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
struct rb_node *rb;
unsigned long flags;
+ /* Can be called during boot if GuC fails to load */
+ if (!engine->gt)
+ return;
+
ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "\n");
/*
@@ -433,8 +417,11 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
- if (guc->lrc_desc_pool)
- guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
+ if (!guc->lrc_desc_pool)
+ return;
+
+ guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
+ i915_sched_engine_put(guc->sched_engine);
}
static int guc_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
@@ -499,32 +486,32 @@ static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *request)
return 0;
}
-static inline void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
struct i915_request *rq,
int prio)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
- i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine->sched_engine, prio));
+ i915_sched_lookup_priolist(sched_engine, prio));
set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
}
static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
{
- struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine;
+ struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = rq->engine->sched_engine;
unsigned long flags;
/* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
- queue_request(engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
+ queue_request(sched_engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
- GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(engine->sched_engine));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(sched_engine));
GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
- tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet);
+ tasklet_hi_schedule(&sched_engine->tasklet);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
}
static void sanitize_hwsp(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -602,8 +589,6 @@ static void guc_release(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
engine->sanitize = NULL; /* no longer in control, nothing to sanitize */
- tasklet_kill(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet);
-
intel_engine_cleanup_common(engine);
lrc_fini_wa_ctx(engine);
}
@@ -674,6 +659,7 @@ static inline void guc_default_irqs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
+ struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
/*
* The setup relies on several assumptions (e.g. irqs always enabled)
@@ -681,7 +667,18 @@ int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
*/
GEM_BUG_ON(GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 11);
- tasklet_setup(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet, guc_submission_tasklet);
+ if (!guc->sched_engine) {
+ guc->sched_engine = i915_sched_engine_create(ENGINE_VIRTUAL);
Does the re-work of the sched_engine create/destroy happen later in this
patch series? Wasn't there issues with the wrong destroy function being
called in certain situations? Or do those issues (and fixes) only come
in with the virtual engine support?
John.
+ if (!guc->sched_engine)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ guc->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
+ guc->sched_engine->private_data = guc;
+ tasklet_setup(&guc->sched_engine->tasklet,
+ guc_submission_tasklet);
+ }
+ i915_sched_engine_put(engine->sched_engine);
+ engine->sched_engine = i915_sched_engine_get(guc->sched_engine);
guc_default_vfuncs(engine);
guc_default_irqs(engine);
