Hi Marek,
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 00:14, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:19:25PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> > If attach has not been called, unloading the driver can result in a null
> > pointer dereference in mipi_dsi_detach as ctx->dsi has not been assigned
> > yet.
>
> Shouldn't this be done in a brige .detach() operation instead ?
>
Could you please take a look?
I don't have a working setup to test moving the code to detach.
> > Fixes: ceb515ba29ba6b ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> > index 750f2172ef08..8e9f45c5c7c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> > @@ -671,8 +671,11 @@ static int sn65dsi83_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > {
> > struct sn65dsi83 *ctx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> >
> > - mipi_dsi_detach(ctx->dsi);
> > - mipi_dsi_device_unregister(ctx->dsi);
> > + if (ctx->dsi) {
> > + mipi_dsi_detach(ctx->dsi);
> > + mipi_dsi_device_unregister(ctx->dsi);
> > + }
> > +
> > drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge);
> > of_node_put(ctx->host_node);
> >
Thanks.
Regards,
Jonathan
