On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 07:45:36PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Drop the workaround and instead implement a better solution. > > Basically we are now chaining all submissions using a dma_fence_chain > container and adding them as exclusive fence to the dma_resv object. > > This way other drivers can still sync to the single exclusive fence > while amdgpu only sync to fences from different processes. > > v3: add the shared fence first before the exclusive one > > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c | 65 --------------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 3 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 - > 6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.h > index a130e766cbdb..c905a4cfc173 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.h > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct amdgpu_fpriv; > struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry { > struct ttm_validate_buffer tv; > struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va; > + struct dma_fence_chain *chain; > uint32_t priority; > struct page **user_pages; > bool user_invalidated; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c > index 9ce649a1a8d3..25655414e9c0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c > @@ -572,6 +572,20 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p, > goto out; > } > > + amdgpu_bo_list_for_each_entry(e, p->bo_list) { > + struct amdgpu_bo *bo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(e->tv.bo); > + > + e->bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_find(vm, bo); > + > + if (bo->tbo.base.dma_buf && !amdgpu_bo_explicit_sync(bo)) { > + e->chain = dma_fence_chain_alloc(); > + if (!e->chain) { > + r = -ENOMEM; > + goto error_validate; > + } > + } > + } > + > amdgpu_cs_get_threshold_for_moves(p->adev, &p->bytes_moved_threshold, > &p->bytes_moved_vis_threshold); > p->bytes_moved = 0; > @@ -599,15 +613,6 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p, > gws = p->bo_list->gws_obj; > oa = p->bo_list->oa_obj; > > - amdgpu_bo_list_for_each_entry(e, p->bo_list) { > - struct amdgpu_bo *bo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(e->tv.bo); > - > - /* Make sure we use the exclusive slot for shared BOs */ > - if (bo->prime_shared_count) > - e->tv.num_shared = 0; > - e->bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_find(vm, bo); > - } > - > if (gds) { > p->job->gds_base = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(gds) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > p->job->gds_size = amdgpu_bo_size(gds) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > @@ -629,8 +634,13 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p, > } > > error_validate: > - if (r) > + if (r) { > + amdgpu_bo_list_for_each_entry(e, p->bo_list) { > + dma_fence_chain_free(e->chain); > + e->chain = NULL; > + } > ttm_eu_backoff_reservation(&p->ticket, &p->validated); > + } > out: > return r; > } > @@ -670,9 +680,17 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_parser_fini(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *parser, int error, > { > unsigned i; > > - if (error && backoff) > + if (error && backoff) { > + struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry *e; > + > + amdgpu_bo_list_for_each_entry(e, parser->bo_list) { > + dma_fence_chain_free(e->chain); > + e->chain = NULL; > + } > + > ttm_eu_backoff_reservation(&parser->ticket, > &parser->validated); > + } > > for (i = 0; i < parser->num_post_deps; i++) { > drm_syncobj_put(parser->post_deps[i].syncobj); > @@ -1245,6 +1263,28 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p, > > amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(p->adev, &fpriv->vm); > > + amdgpu_bo_list_for_each_entry(e, p->bo_list) { > + struct dma_resv *resv = e->tv.bo->base.resv; > + struct dma_fence_chain *chain = e->chain; > + > + if (!chain) > + continue; > + > + /* > + * Work around dma_resv shortcommings by wrapping up the > + * submission in a dma_fence_chain and add it as exclusive > + * fence, but first add the submission as shared fence to make > + * sure that shared fences never signal before the exclusive > + * one. > + */ > + dma_fence_chain_init(chain, dma_resv_excl_fence(resv), > + dma_fence_get(p->fence), 1); > + > + dma_resv_add_shared_fence(resv, p->fence); > + rcu_assign_pointer(resv->fence_excl, &chain->base); Ok I should have looked more carefully, +/- memory barriers this looks correct. So my idea behind the dma_resv_add_shared_exclusive_fence helper was that it would give us more flexibility for changing the internals. Since I do like your idea from a few weeks back of just storing exclusive fences as shared ones, but with a marker, and then the interface functions picking the right set of fences depending what the caller wants. But for that we'd need to drop a lot more abstraction of the internals into dma_resv and make sure everyone is using it. Because looking at drivers there's indeed both the concept of a truly exclusive fence, and the "it's actually a shared fence but stuff it into the exclusive fence slot for implicit sync" variety. And from what I can see, everyone gets it wrong, but in lots of different ways. Hence the wrapper for this concept, and then making sure we roll it out to all the drivers. I think all the ones with a NO_IMPLICIT flag (or equivalent, i915 and msm have it the other way round iirc) would need this to not break the dma_resv contract too badly. But also I guess we can bikeshed this later on even more. On this: Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > + e->chain = NULL; > + } > + > ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(&p->ticket, &p->validated, p->fence); > mutex_unlock(&p->adev->notifier_lock); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c > index c3053b83b80c..23219fc3b28c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c > @@ -42,48 +42,6 @@ > #include <linux/pci-p2pdma.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > -static int > -__dma_resv_make_exclusive(struct dma_resv *obj) > -{ > - struct dma_fence **fences; > - unsigned int count; > - int r; > - > - if (!dma_resv_shared_list(obj)) /* no shared fences to convert */ > - return 0; > - > - r = dma_resv_get_fences(obj, NULL, &count, &fences); > - if (r) > - return r; > - > - if (count == 0) { > - /* Now that was unexpected. */ > - } else if (count == 1) { > - dma_resv_add_excl_fence(obj, fences[0]); > - dma_fence_put(fences[0]); > - kfree(fences); > - } else { > - struct dma_fence_array *array; > - > - array = dma_fence_array_create(count, fences, > - dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 0, > - false); > - if (!array) > - goto err_fences_put; > - > - dma_resv_add_excl_fence(obj, &array->base); > - dma_fence_put(&array->base); > - } > - > - return 0; > - > -err_fences_put: > - while (count--) > - dma_fence_put(fences[count]); > - kfree(fences); > - return -ENOMEM; > -} > - > /** > * amdgpu_dma_buf_attach - &dma_buf_ops.attach implementation > * > @@ -110,24 +68,6 @@ static int amdgpu_dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, > if (r < 0) > goto out; > > - r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(bo, false); > - if (unlikely(r != 0)) > - goto out; > - > - /* > - * We only create shared fences for internal use, but importers > - * of the dmabuf rely on exclusive fences for implicitly > - * tracking write hazards. As any of the current fences may > - * correspond to a write, we need to convert all existing > - * fences on the reservation object into a single exclusive > - * fence. > - */ > - r = __dma_resv_make_exclusive(bo->tbo.base.resv); > - if (r) > - goto out; > - > - bo->prime_shared_count++; > - amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo); > return 0; > > out: > @@ -150,9 +90,6 @@ static void amdgpu_dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, > struct amdgpu_bo *bo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(obj); > struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev); > > - if (attach->dev->driver != adev->dev->driver && bo->prime_shared_count) > - bo->prime_shared_count--; > - > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(adev_to_drm(adev)->dev); > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(adev_to_drm(adev)->dev); > } > @@ -406,8 +343,6 @@ amdgpu_dma_buf_create_obj(struct drm_device *dev, struct dma_buf *dma_buf) > bo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(gobj); > bo->allowed_domains = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT; > bo->preferred_domains = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT; > - if (dma_buf->ops != &amdgpu_dmabuf_ops) > - bo->prime_shared_count = 1; > > dma_resv_unlock(resv); > return gobj; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c > index 9cf4beaf646c..0780e8d18992 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c > @@ -829,7 +829,8 @@ int amdgpu_gem_op_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > break; > } > case AMDGPU_GEM_OP_SET_PLACEMENT: > - if (robj->prime_shared_count && (args->value & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM)) { > + if (robj->tbo.base.import_attach && > + args->value & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) { > r = -EINVAL; > amdgpu_bo_unreserve(robj); > break; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c > index b7a2070d90af..d13490975ac3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c > @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ int amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, u32 domain, > return -EINVAL; > > /* A shared bo cannot be migrated to VRAM */ > - if (bo->prime_shared_count || bo->tbo.base.import_attach) { > + if (bo->tbo.base.import_attach) { > if (domain & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT) > domain = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT; > else > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h > index 126df03a7066..c03dfd298f45 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h > @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ struct amdgpu_bo { > struct ttm_buffer_object tbo; > struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj kmap; > u64 flags; > - unsigned prime_shared_count; > /* per VM structure for page tables and with virtual addresses */ > struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *vm_bo; > /* Constant after initialization */ > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch