On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 01:00:33PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > > I think I would see if it's possible to call
> > > > > vga_arb_select_default_device() from vga_arbiter_add_pci_device()
> > > > > instead of from vga_arb_device_init().
> > > > >
> > > > > I would also (as a separate patch) try to get rid of this loop in
> > > > > vga_arb_device_init():
> > > > >
> > > > > list_for_each_entry(vgadev, &vga_list, list) {
> > > > > struct device *dev = &vgadev->pdev->dev;
> > > > >
> > > > > if (vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga)
> > > > > vgaarb_info(dev, "bridge control possible\n");
> > > > > else
> > > > > vgaarb_info(dev, "no bridge control possible\n");
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > and do the vgaarb_info() in vga_arbiter_check_bridge_sharing(), where
> > > > > the loop would not be needed.
> > > >
> > > > Any updates?
> > >
> > > Are you waiting for me to do something else?
> > >
> > > I suggested an approach above, but I don't have time to actually do
> > > the work for you.
> >
> > Yes, I am really waiting... but I am also investigating history
> > and thinking.
Well, don't wait for me because this work is not on my to-do list :)
> > If I haven't missed something (correct me if I'm wrong). For the
> > original HiSilicon problem, the first attempt is to modify
> > vga_arbiter_add_pci_device() and remove the VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MASK
> > check. But vga_arbiter_add_pci_device() is called for each PCI device,
> > so removing that check will cause the first VGA device to be the
> > default VGA device. This breaks some x86 platforms, so after that you
> > don't touch vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(), but add
> > vga_arb_select_default_device() in vga_arb_device_init().
> >
> > If the above history is correct, then we cannot add
> > vga_arb_select_default_device() in vga_arbiter_add_pci_device()
> > directly. So it seems we can only add vga_arb_select_default_device()
> > in pci_notify(). And if we don't care about hotplug, we can simply use
> > subsys_initcall_sync() to wrap vga_arb_device_init().
> >
> > And DRM developers, please let me know what do you think about?
>
> I'm not 100% following what is going on here.
>
> Do you need call vga_arb_select_default_device after hotplug for some
> reason, or it this just a race with subsys_init?
>
> I think just adding subsys_initcall_sync should be fine
Doing subsys_initcall_sync(vga_arb_device_init) is probably "OK". I
don't think it's *great* because initcalls don't make dependencies
explicit so it won't be obvious *why* it's subsys_initcall_sync, and
it feels a little like a band-aid.
> I don't see why you'd want to care about making a hotplug VGA device
> the default at this point.
I don't think hotplug per se is relevant for this ASpeed case.
But I think the current design is slightly broken in that we set up
the machinery to call vga_arbiter_add_pci_device() for hot-added
devices, but a hot-added device can never be set as the default VGA
device.
Imagine a system with a single VGA device. If that device is plugged
in before boot, it becomes the default VGA device. If it is hot-added
after boot, it does not. That inconsistency feels wrong to me.
If it were possible to set the default VGA device in
vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(), it would fix that inconsistency and
solve the ASpeed case. But maybe that's not practical.
Bjorn
