On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 08:54:38AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:27:49PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > On 25/05/2021 14:56, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:32:12AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > > As discussed in [1] start merging some support patches as a precursor to > > > > GuC submission the i915. This is step #1 mentioned in [1]. > > > > > > > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89844/ > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Pushed to drm-intel-gt-next, thanks for patches&reviews. Btw you can also > > > ping John H or Daniele for pushing stuff for you, should be quicker than > > > waiting for me to return from a lon w/e :-) > > > > > > Plus I _really_ don't want to get back into the business of pushing other > > > people's work ... > > > > To Matt - Also please take care to preserve r-b's when resurrecting patches > > because all of these three had mine from before which is now lost in git > > history. > > > > Will do. Still getting used to the upstream rules and wasn't sure if > should have included your old R-Bs. If you have an r-b but for an old version with some significant changes compared to the current one add a (v1) or similar tag at the end of that r-b. That way it's not lost, but also not misattributed to a newer and potentially buggy version of the patch. -Daniel > > Matt > > > Regards, > > > > Tvrtko -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
