On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 12:00 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 16:33, Thomas Hellström > <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > If the bo is idle when calling ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(), we > > unnecessarily > > create a ghost object and push it out to delayed destroy. > > Fix this by adding a path for idle, and document the function. > > > > Also avoid having the bo end up in a bad state vulnerable to user- > > space > > triggered kernel BUGs if the call to ttm_tt_create() fails. > > > > Finally reuse ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting() in ttm_bo_evict(). > > > > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 20 ++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 52 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c | 5 +++ > > include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h | 10 ++++++ > > 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > > index ca1b098b6a56..a8fa3375b8aa 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > > @@ -501,10 +501,15 @@ static int ttm_bo_evict(struct > > ttm_buffer_object *bo, > > bdev->funcs->evict_flags(bo, &placement); > > > > if (!placement.num_placement && > > !placement.num_busy_placement) { > > - ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false); > > + ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, true, false); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > > > - ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo); > > - return ttm_tt_create(bo, false); > > + /* > > + * Since we've already synced, this frees backing > > store > > + * immediately. > > + */ > > + return ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(bo); > > } > > > > ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &placement, &evict_mem, ctx); > > @@ -974,13 +979,8 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object > > *bo, > > /* > > * Remove the backing store if no placement is given. > > */ > > - if (!placement->num_placement && !placement- > > >num_busy_placement) { > > - ret = ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(bo); > > - if (ret) > > - return ret; > > - > > - return ttm_tt_create(bo, false); > > - } > > + if (!placement->num_placement && !placement- > > >num_busy_placement) > > + return ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(bo); > > > > /* > > * Check whether we need to move buffer. > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c > > index 4a7d3d672f9a..7fa9b3a852eb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c > > @@ -585,26 +585,70 @@ int ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup(struct > > ttm_buffer_object *bo, > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup); > > > > +/** > > + * ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting - purge the contents of a bo > > + * @bo: The buffer object > > + * > > + * Purge the contents of a bo, async if the bo is not idle. > > + * After a successful call, the bo is left unpopulated in > > + * system placement. The function may wait uninterruptible > > + * for idle on OOM. > > + * > > + * Return: 0 if successful, negative error code on failure. > > + */ > > int ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) > > { > > static const struct ttm_place sys_mem = { .mem_type = > > TTM_PL_SYSTEM }; > > struct ttm_buffer_object *ghost; > > + struct ttm_tt *ttm; > > int ret; > > > > - ret = ttm_buffer_object_transfer(bo, &ghost); > > + /* If already idle, no need for ghost object dance. */ > > + ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, true); > > + if (ret != -EBUSY) { > > + if (!bo->ttm) { > > + ret = ttm_tt_create(bo, true); > > Why do we now unconditionally add clearing? Below also. Here we've dropped the bo content and we add but do not populate a page vector. Now if someone resurrects this object we obtain new pages and those must be cleared, at least that's the intention. /Thomas