Re: [PATCH] drm/fb-helper: improve DRM fbdev emulation device names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

Am 21.05.21 um 19:18 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
On 5/21/21 6:53 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:

[snip]


So what with all the drivers which do _not_ have drm in their name? Also
I'm never sure how much these are uapi or not ...


That someone could threat as an uapi is a fair point indeed.
Why do we need a suffix anyway?


Yes, I thought the same and was torn about posting a patch to just remove
the suffix. I don't think users care that much if is a fb device from a
fbdev driver or a DRM driver using the fbdev emulation.

Yup. I don't see how anything in userspace would depend on the exact name; especially since fbdev emulation only provides basic features. (I'd welcome a counter examples that proves me wrong.)

IMHO we can risk it to remove the suffix entirely. But that needs an ack from Daniel or Dave.

Best regards
Thomas


-Daniel


Best regards,


--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux