[AMD Official Use Only]
I have reverted Chris' patch, still hit this failure.
Just see two lines in Chris' patch. Any BO in cpu domian would be swapout first. That is why we hit this issue frequently now. But the bug is there long time ago.
- for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
- list_for_each_entry(bo, &glob->swap_lru[i], swap) {
[snip]
+ for (i = TTM_PL_SYSTEM; i < TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES; ++i) {
+ for (j = 0; j < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++j) {
________________________________________
发件人: Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2021年5月19日 12:09
收件人: Kuehling, Felix; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
抄送: Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxx
主题: 回复: [RFC PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Fix memory corruption due to swapout and swapin
yes, we really dont swapout SG BOs.
The problems is that before we validate a userptr BO, we create this BO in CPU domain by default. So this BO has chance to swapout.
we set flag TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG on userptr BO in popluate() which is too late.
I have not try to revert Chris' patch as I think it desnt help. Or I can have a try later.
________________________________________
发件人: Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2021年5月19日 11:29
收件人: Pan, Xinhui; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
抄送: Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Fix memory corruption due to swapout and swapin
Swapping SG BOs makes no sense, because TTM doesn't own the pages of
this type of BO.
Last I checked, userptr BOs (and other SG BOs) were protected from
swapout by the fact that they would not be added to the swap-LRU. But it
looks like Christian just removed the swap-LRU. I guess this broke that
protection:
commit 2cb51d22d70b18eaf339abf9758bf0b7608da65c
Author: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Oct 6 16:30:09 2020 +0200
drm/ttm: remove swap LRU v3
Instead evict round robin from each devices SYSTEM and TT domain.
v2: reorder num_pages access reported by Dan's script
v3: fix rebase fallout, num_pages should be 32bit
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.freedesktop.org%2Fpatch%2F424009%2F&data=04%7C01%7CXinhui.Pan%40amd.com%7Cb4422d8b3e4947cd243c08d91aad14c3%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637570152942496679%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=K3%2FnFpN56y8L49UuYRM6SqefVFLnqIwpDAtWpS1XvnQ%3D&reserved=0
Regards,
Felix
On 2021-05-18 10:28 p.m., xinhui pan wrote:
cpu 1 cpu 2
kfd alloc BO A(userptr) alloc BO B(GTT)
->init -> validate -> init -> validate -> populate
init_user_pages -> swapout BO A //hit ttm pages limit
-> get_user_pages (fill up ttm->pages)
-> validate -> populate
-> swapin BO A // Now hit the BUG
We know that get_user_pages may race with swapout on same BO.
Threre are some issues I have met.
1) memory corruption.
This is because we do a swap before memory is setup. ttm_tt_swapout()
just create a swap_storage with its content being 0x0. So when we setup
memory after the swapout. The following swapin makes the memory
corrupted.
2) panic
When swapout happes with get_user_pages, they touch ttm->pages without
anylock. It causes memory corruption too. But I hit page fault mostly.
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index 928e8d57cd08..42460e4480f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -835,6 +835,7 @@ static int init_user_pages(struct kgd_mem *mem, uint64_t user_addr)
struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info = mem->process_info;
struct amdgpu_bo *bo = mem->bo;
struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { true, false };
+ struct page **pages;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&process_info->lock);
@@ -852,7 +853,13 @@ static int init_user_pages(struct kgd_mem *mem, uint64_t user_addr)
goto out;
}
- ret = amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages(bo, bo->tbo.ttm->pages);
+ pages = kvmalloc_array(bo->tbo.ttm->num_pages,
+ sizeof(struct page *),
+ GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+ if (!pages)
+ goto unregister_out;
+
+ ret = amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages(bo, pages);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to get user pages: %d\n", __func__, ret);
goto unregister_out;
@@ -863,6 +870,12 @@ static int init_user_pages(struct kgd_mem *mem, uint64_t user_addr)
pr_err("%s: Failed to reserve BO\n", __func__);
goto release_out;
}
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->tbo.ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SWAPPED);
+
+ memcpy(bo->tbo.ttm->pages,
+ pages,
+ sizeof(struct page*) * bo->tbo.ttm->num_pages);
amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(bo, mem->domain);
ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
if (ret)
@@ -872,6 +885,7 @@ static int init_user_pages(struct kgd_mem *mem, uint64_t user_addr)
release_out:
amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages_done(bo->tbo.ttm);
unregister_out:
+ kvfree(pages);
if (ret)
amdgpu_mn_unregister(bo);
out:
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=04%7C01%7CXinhui.Pan%40amd.com%7Cb4422d8b3e4947cd243c08d91aad14c3%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637570152942496679%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=QOuCH8r6DMdp%2Bvr6LAPhDw0BUCKPzK%2Bbv6MoHx4AmMo%3D&reserved=0
