On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:54 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > SRIOV is kinda by design vendor specific. You set up the VF endpoint, it > shows up, it's all hw+fw magic. Nothing for cgroups to manage here at all. Right, so in theory you just use the device cgroup with the VF endpoints. > All I meant is that for the container/cgroups world starting out with > time-sharing feels like the best fit, least because your SRIOV designers > also seem to think that's the best first cut for cloud-y computing. > Whether it's virtualized or containerized is a distinction that's getting > ever more blurry, with virtualization become a lot more dynamic and > container runtimes als possibly using hw virtualization underneath. I disagree. By the same logic, the existence of CU mask would imply it being the preferred way for sub-device control per process. Kenny
