>Hi Wan, > >Instead of remove the first dc_state, remove the second one. > >Thanks Hi Rodrigo, Thanks for your reply. OK, in fact, there are no functions using struct dc_state between two struct declarations. So I think removing anyone is OK. Remove the first one to make it more closer to user. Remove the second one more secure. I will send v2. You can choose one of the two. >On 04/29, Wan Jiabing wrote: >> There are two declarations of struct dc_state here. >> The later one is closer to its user. Remove the former duplicate. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h >> index 8108b82bac60..cad045db6ea2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h >> @@ -276,8 +276,6 @@ enum surface_update_type { >> /* Forward declaration*/ >> struct dc; >> struct dc_plane_state; >> -struct dc_state; >> - >> >> struct dc_cap_funcs { >> bool (*get_dcc_compression_cap)(const struct dc *dc, >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> > >-- >Rodrigo Siqueira >https://siqueira.tech Yours, Wan Jiabing _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel