Hi Randy, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 02:37:27PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > When DRM_RCAR_DU=y and DRM_RCAR_LVDS=m, there are several build errors > as reported by 'kernel test robot'. These can be corrected by changing > "imply" to "select". > > In looking at this, the same problem (build errors) happens when > DRM_RCAR_DU=y and DRM_RCAR_CMM=m, so again change the "imply" to > "select" here as well. > > These 2 changes fix the following 8 build/link errors: > > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x1be8): undefined reference to `rcar_lvds_clk_enable' > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x2438): undefined reference to `rcar_lvds_clk_disable' > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.o: in function `rcar_du_init': > rcar_du_drv.c:(.init.text+0x14): undefined reference to `rcar_du_of_init' > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.o: in function `rcar_du_encoder_init': > rcar_du_encoder.c:(.text+0x1d4): undefined reference to `rcar_lvds_dual_link' > > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_cmm_setup': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x380): undefined reference to `rcar_cmm_setup' > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x1c08): undefined reference to `rcar_cmm_enable' > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x231c): undefined reference to `rcar_cmm_disable' > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.o: in function `rcar_du_modeset_init': > rcar_du_kms.c:(.text+0xd08): undefined reference to `rcar_cmm_init' > > Fixes: e08e934d6c28 ("drm: rcar-du: Add support for CMM") > Fixes: 02f2b30032c1 ("drm: rcar-du: lvds: Add API to enable/disable clock output") > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- linux-next-20210420.orig/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > +++ linux-next-20210420/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU > depends on DRM && OF > depends on ARM || ARM64 > depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST > - imply DRM_RCAR_CMM > - imply DRM_RCAR_LVDS > + select DRM_RCAR_CMM > + select DRM_RCAR_LVDS No all platforms that integrate a DU have CMM and/or LVDS support, so we shouldn't select the automatically. Would depends on DRM_RCAR_CMM || DRM_RCAR_CMM=n depends on DRM_RCAR_LVDS || DRM_RCAR_LVDS=n work ? I thought that's what "imply" meant, but it seems I got it wrong. > select DRM_KMS_HELPER > select DRM_KMS_CMA_HELPER > select DRM_GEM_CMA_HELPER -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel