On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:56:24 +0200 "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -530,6 +525,11 @@ void ttm_pool_fini(struct ttm_pool *pool) > for (j = 0; j < MAX_ORDER; ++j) > ttm_pool_type_fini(&pool->caching[i].orders[j]); > } > + > + /* We removed the pool types from the LRU, but we need to also make sure > + * that no shrinker is concurrently freeing pages from the pool. > + */ > + sync_shrinkers(); It isn't immediately clear to me how this works. ttm_pool_fini() has already freed all the pages hasn't it? So why would it care if some shrinkers are still playing with the pages? Or is it the case that ttm_pool_fini() is assuming that there will be some further action against these pages, which requires that shrinkers no longer be accessing the pages and which further assumes that future shrinker invocations will not be able to look up these pages? IOW, a bit more explanation about the dynamics here would help! _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
