Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/amd/display: Add DC_FP helper to check FPU state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 31.03.21 um 14:25 schrieb Rodrigo Siqueira:
To fully isolate FPU operations in a single place, we must avoid
situations where compilers spill FP values to registers due to FP enable
in a specific C file. Note that even if we isolate all FPU functions in
a single file and call its interface from other files, the compiler
might enable the use of FPU before we call DC_FP_START. Nevertheless, it
is the programmer's responsibility to invoke DC_FP_START/END in the
correct place. To highlight situations where developers forgot to use
the FP protection before calling the DC FPU interface functions, we
introduce a helper that checks if the function is invoked under FP
protection. If not, it will trigger a kernel warning.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@xxxxxxx>
---
  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c    | 34 ++++++++++++++++---
  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.h    |  1 +
  .../drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c |  2 ++
  .../drm/amd/display/dc/fpu_operations/dcn2x.c | 17 ++++++++++
  4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
index 5dcefe193523..0d95f680b62b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
@@ -40,6 +40,25 @@
   */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, fpu_ref);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, fp_dc_enabled);
+
+/**
+ * is_fp_dc_enabled - Check if FPU protection is enabled
+ *
+ * This function tells if the code is already under FPU protection or not. A
+ * function that works as an API for a set of FPU operations can use this
+ * function for checking if the caller invoked it after DC_FP_START(). For
+ * example, take a look at dcn2x.c file.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * Return true if we already enabled FPU protection, otherwise return false.
+ */
+inline bool is_fp_dc_enabled(void)

I would rather name this dc_is_fp_enabled() or even better directly make this dc_assert_fp_enabled().

+{
+	atomic_t *fp_enabled = this_cpu_ptr(&fp_dc_enabled);
+
+	return atomic_read(fp_enabled);

The handling with fp_enaled is overkill. Instead you can also check fpu_ref for > 1.

Regards,
Christian.

+}
/**
   * dc_fpu_begin - Enables FPU protection
@@ -55,12 +74,15 @@ void dc_fpu_begin(const char *function_name, const int line)
  {
  	int ret;
  	atomic_t *local_fpu_ref = this_cpu_ptr(&fpu_ref);
+	atomic_t *fp_enabled = this_cpu_ptr(&fp_dc_enabled);
ret = atomic_inc_return(local_fpu_ref);
  	TRACE_DCN_FPU(true, function_name, line, ret);
- if (ret == 1)
+	if (ret == 1) {
  		kernel_fpu_begin();
+		atomic_set(fp_enabled, 1);
+	}
  }
/**
@@ -75,13 +97,15 @@ void dc_fpu_begin(const char *function_name, const int line)
   */
  void dc_fpu_end(const char *function_name, const int line)
  {
-
-	int ret;
+	bool ret;
  	atomic_t *local_fpu_ref = this_cpu_ptr(&fpu_ref);
+	atomic_t *fp_enabled = this_cpu_ptr(&fp_dc_enabled);
- ret = atomic_dec_return(local_fpu_ref);
+	ret = atomic_dec_and_test(local_fpu_ref);
  	TRACE_DCN_FPU(false, function_name, line, ret);
- if (!ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		atomic_set(fp_enabled, 0);
  		kernel_fpu_end();
+	}
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.h
index fb54983c5c60..e782dfa640bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
  #ifndef __DC_FPU_H__
  #define __DC_FPU_H__
+bool is_fp_dc_enabled(void);
  void dc_fpu_begin(const char *function_name, const int line);
  void dc_fpu_end(const char *function_name, const int line);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
index b58edd012038..d0771e29c243 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
@@ -2351,7 +2351,9 @@ int dcn20_populate_dml_pipes_from_context(
  	}
/* populate writeback information */
+	DC_FP_START();
  	dc->res_pool->funcs->populate_dml_writeback_from_context(dc, res_ctx, pipes);
+	DC_FP_END();
return pipe_cnt;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/fpu_operations/dcn2x.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/fpu_operations/dcn2x.c
index 32b23a182428..1c8a97d342c0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/fpu_operations/dcn2x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/fpu_operations/dcn2x.c
@@ -42,6 +42,22 @@
   *    that deals with FP register is contained within this call.
   * 3. All function that needs to be accessed outside this file requires a
   *    public interface that not uses any FPU reference.
+ * 4. Developers should not use DC_FP_START/END in this file, but they need to
+ *    ensure that the caller invokes it before access any function available in
+ *    this file. For this reason, public API in this file must invoke
+ *    ASSERT(is_fp_dc_enabled());
+ *
+ * Let's expand a little bit more the idea in the code pattern number for. To
+ * fully isolate FPU operations in a single place, we must avoid situations
+ * where compilers spill FP values to registers due to FP enable in a specific
+ * C file. Note that even if we isolate all FPU functions in a single file and
+ * call its interface from other files, the compiler might enable the use of
+ * FPU before we call DC_FP_START. Nevertheless, it is the programmer's
+ * responsibility to invoke DC_FP_START/END in the correct place. To highlight
+ * situations where developers forgot to use the FP protection before calling
+ * the DC FPU interface functions, we introduce a helper that checks if the
+ * function is invoked under FP protection. If not, it will trigger a kernel
+ * warning.
   */
static noinline void _dcn20_populate_dml_writeback_from_context(struct dc *dc,
@@ -84,6 +100,7 @@ static noinline void _dcn20_populate_dml_writeback_from_context(struct dc *dc,
  void dcn20_populate_dml_writeback_from_context(struct dc *dc,
  	struct resource_context *res_ctx, display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes)
  {
+	ASSERT(is_fp_dc_enabled());
  	_dcn20_populate_dml_writeback_from_context(dc, res_ctx, pipes);
  }

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux