From: David Laight > Sent: 24 March 2021 09:12 > > From: Martin Sebor > > Sent: 22 March 2021 22:08 > ... > > In GCC 11, all access warnings expect objects to be either declared > > or allocated. Pointers with constant values are taken to point to > > nothing valid (as Arnd mentioned above, this is to detect invalid > > accesses to members of structs at address zero). > > > > One possible solution to the known address problem is to extend GCC > > attributes address and io that pin an object to a hardwired address > > to all targets (at the moment they're supported on just one or two > > targets). I'm not sure this can still happen before GCC 11 releases > > sometime in April or May. > > A different solution is to define a normal C external data item > and then assign a fixed address with an asm statement or in > the linker script. Or stop gcc tracking the value by using: struct foo *foo = (void *)xxxxx; asm ("", "+r" (foo)); If the address is used more than once forcing it into a register is also likely to generate better code. David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel