[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/mc: make tu102_mc_intr_mask and tu102_mc_intr_rearm static

[Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Fix the following sparse warning:

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c:74:1: warning: symbol
'tu102_mc_intr_mask' was not declared. Should it be static?

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c:62:1: warning: symbol
'tu102_mc_intr_rearm' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
  -Modified the commit message.

 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c
index 58db83e..7cf659cc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/tu102.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct tu102_mc {
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mc->lock, flags);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 tu102_mc_intr_rearm(struct nvkm_mc *base)
 {
 	struct tu102_mc *mc = tu102_mc(base);
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct tu102_mc {
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mc->lock, flags);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 tu102_mc_intr_mask(struct nvkm_mc *base, u32 mask, u32 intr)
 {
 	struct tu102_mc *mc = tu102_mc(base);
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel