Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:


s/particuar/particular/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
 * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
 * otherwise the device will error.
- * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
+ * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
 * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
 * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
 * context is referenced in the command stream.
--
2.26.2


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux