On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 08:04, Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > > when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 > > which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i915 and i965 drivers in Mesa at the time > > both used libdrm and so did the Intel X11 back-end. The SNA back-end > > for X11 has always used execbuffer2. > > All execbuffer users in the past that I'm aware of used libdrm, which > now uses the execbuffer2 ioctl for this API. That means these > applications will remain ABI compatible through this change. > > Acked-by: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
